The description of the Lloyd's policy is confusing. It has an "aggregate limit" of $150mm. I assume that is intended to cover all customers...that's what "aggregate" means to me. But unfortunately, what we don't know is how many customers have cash in excess of $100K, the SIPC limit, and how many dollars that represents. Because you would need to know that in order to determine even in a reasonable ballpark what "aggregate" really means in terms of your cash position.
The real question is which bank is holding the cash for IB?
If that bank goes belly up than IB won't be able to get customer cash. IB the brokerage might be strong but they do not hold the cash directly as far as I know.
That's not specifically the issue. If a bunch of brokers failed, theoretically no customers should lose anything because their accounts are segregated from assets of the firms.
SIPC insurance is for "missing securities and/or cash"... missing would include such things as lost, stolen, or illegally spent by somebody in the firm.... like if customer money were illegally used to pay the firm's rent, parties, lap dances, etc... which of course would be theft from customer accounts.
Hold the phone. Did everyone digest what gnome just said? ".......Missing cash and securities."
Let me understand correctly here. FDIC is a federal guarantee that the cash in my bank account will be paid back to me in the event of a run on my bank, but SIPC cannot guarantee my cash account at XYZ brokerage in the event of an investor run?
Does the Lloyd's of London policy cover my margin cash in the event of such a run, or is it also for "missing cash/securities"?