Simplicity in TA

Quote from FreakofNature:

Been trying to follow your reads but I see lack of conviction in most of the reads.

If up then down, sort of stuff yet when you come back to revisit what was posted most of the replies begin with "As I ....."

Not to break your balls but a little more conviction would be more convincing to those reading.

It's like every read leaves no room for error as you tend to cover all the bases, up and down.

"We might break out but looks down"

"Looks lower but could break out"

"Anything can happen"

Well we already know any of that is probable at any given time, Im here to get an edge and perhaps choose a side.

Apologies but just something I had to get out of my chest.
He doesn't know.
 
This is trading. Outsiders never understand it. They want opinion and trader shouldn't have an opinion. He may be long but looking for short or any other combo as Xspurt said.

Everything is a continuously changing balance of odds in this business. And one either adapts... or falls prey to someone else who adapts better.
 
Quote from JohnsonMM:

He doesn't know.

Are we to assume you do then? Outside of maybe 5-10 people in the world, does anyone on earth know? The best we can all hope to do is keep track of the evidence and be prepared if/when things change. I think Xspurt does a terrific job presenting the evidence.
 
Quote from dolemitettu:
Are we to assume you do then? Outside of maybe 5-10 people in the world, does anyone on earth know? The best we can all hope to do is keep track of the evidence and be prepared if/when things change. I think Xspurt does a terrific job presenting the evidence.
Of course I do... at times...my legend precedes me...the way lightning precedes thunder...but let's not deviate this thread from its purpose, which is to present "simplicity in TA" according to Xspurt's analytical and trading abilities...or lack thereof...which are now apparent to more people than just...me...me...me...me...

FoN for example...and surely dozens of silent lurkers...
 
Quote from JohnsonMM:

Of course I do... at times...my legend precedes me...the way lightning precedes thunder...but let's not deviate this thread from its purpose, which is to present "simplicity in TA" according to Xspurt's analytical and trading abilities...or lack thereof...which are now apparent to more people than just...me...me...me...me...

FoN for example...and surely dozens of silent lurkers...

Welcome back, new ID and all.

Last time you validated your criticism with an outstanding call that got your head handed to you.

Please gives us another example of where I am wrong :)
 
Quote from Xspurt:


Please gives us another example of where I am wrong :)
This.

....
Anyway. Best of luck with sick mom recovery, and trading, and selling training to newbs, etc.

Apparently they caught that child molester, that you accused me of being, and he was not me. Just another mistake of yours. Another black stripe for the tiger?...err, the zebra...

Bye.
 
Quote from FreakofNature:

Been trying to follow your reads but I see lack of conviction in most of the reads.

If up then down, sort of stuff yet when you come back to revisit what was posted most of the replies begin with "As I ....."

Not to break your balls but a little more conviction would be more convincing to those reading.

It's like every read leaves no room for error as you tend to cover all the bases, up and down.

"We might break out but looks down"

"Looks lower but could break out"

"Anything can happen"

Well we already know any of that is probable at any given time, Im here to get an edge and perhaps choose a side.

Apologies but just something I had to get out of my chest.

I asked you to clarify by giving me an example of where I am not clear, but so far no come back. It was a genuine request to check if I am not being understood or if you cannot read a signal bar.

Looking at the big picture, I mapped out the move to the top, the breakdown, and the the ABC pull back all well in advance of it happening.

Looking at the medium picture I have called daily reversals...

Then on the intraday view I have called 4hr reversals and lower too.

Over the weekend I was saying I don't buy into the new high on the Dow as good news and had become very bearish looking for a short signal.

I don't know how to show more conviction or set you up to be on the right side of a major trade any better than this unless I actually hit the mouse for you.

If you can read a signal you'd have been long as I said I was until this weekend and then you'd have been reverting to very bearish mode looking to reverse short and ignoring the ballyhoo about new highs.

Over to you ;)
 
From a simple TA perspective the line in the sand is around 1320-25, that would be a backtest of the broken downtrend from the 2007 high. Is that right?

FWIW I'd guess that line would hold if tested and the bull market will continue for another couple of months or so... but that's only a guess.
 
Quote from JohnsonMM:

Of course I do... at times...my legend precedes me...the way lightning precedes thunder...but let's not deviate this thread from its purpose, which is to present "simplicity in TA" according to Xspurt's analytical and trading abilities...or lack thereof...which are now apparent to more people than just...me...me...me...me...

FoN for example...and surely dozens of silent lurkers...

This is a joke right?:confused:

Only on ET...
 
Some questions. How do you know that it's the rising wedge that the market is "adhering to" and that a short bias is appropriate? Why not the broken trendline from the 2007 high or the uptrend from the October low and a bullish bias?

Why not look at this pullback as a buying opportunity? Why not say 1320ish is the "buy zone" because of the two possible support lines in that area?
 

Attachments

Back
Top