
Quote from alpha_monkey:
This thread is great.
It's interesting to read the banter between T28's 'Take Em All 2 minute Tommy gun' and Romik's orthodox 'Supportive Higher Timeframes' view. Surely the way to resolve this comes down to numbers.
A 1:1 with a 50% hit rate = go home
B 1:1 with an 80% hit rate = love your work
C 2:1 with a 50% hit rate = love your work
Assuming B & C are realisable, how happy one is surely comes down to the number of trades per day.
If B trades 10 times a day, lets say he gets 8 winners and 2 losers, net +6. If C trades 10 times per day, lets say he gets 5 winners and 5 losers, net +5. However, if B drops to 70% accuracy per day on 10 trades, he ends up with net +4. (And higher comms charges than C.) Similarly, if C can only manage 8 2:1 trades a day, he ends up with net +4.
Without going any further, the 'best' approach is dependent on trade expectancy and trade frequency. It would be very interesting if anyone who has been trading the SPM a while is willing to share their trading stats. i.e.
- % of signals taken per day
- average number of trades per day
- % win / loss rate
- average win size / loss size
T28 - any interest?
Cheers,
AM