Simple Profitable Method - Take 2

[JSSPMK]

Quote from Allaces:

1: You were laughingly, embarrassingly wrong as many have already told you

2: You acted like a stubborn child throwing a tantrum when people tried to help you

You need a new personality

that's what I said & stand by what I have said, unlike you.

Quote from JSSPMK:

I've played hundreds of hands in BJ & believe me when I say that after 4-5 bad hands you will get a winning hand most times on maximum 7th hand IF you stick to the rules (http://wizardofodds.com/powerblackjack).

 

[Allaces]

Quote from JSSPMK:

that's what I said & stand by what I have said.

Yeah well anyone that understands mathematics is laughing their head off at you

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from Allaces:

Yeah well anyone that understands mathematics is laughing their head off at you

As if I care

 

[GTS]

Quote from JSSPMK:
It's like in Blackjack in a way, who has a more favourable odds of getting a better hand after you have 4-5 consecutive losses, you or a dealer? You, of course

Of course....not

But wait, JSSPMK has played BJ hundred of times so he *knows* this to be true, LOL.

Don't worry JSSPMK, lots of people believed the earth was flat for the longest time...enjoy your ignorance.

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from GTS:

Of course....not

But wait, JSSPMK has played BJ hundred of times so he *knows* this to be true, LOL.

Don't worry JSSPMK, lots of people believed the earth was flat for the longest time...enjoy your ignorance.

Again, I've posted observation based on actual events taking place, you both keep bringing up irrelevant info. Nobody can logically dispute the fact that no matter how many consecutive tails you get you are bound to get heads because of 50/50, this event can't not occur. 50/50 creates equal odds, which are equally good in favour of both sides of coin. Every consecutive toss creates a more remote opportunity of continuation to continue (you concurred to this yourself), therefore probability increases of an opposite coin toss happening, it's a simple reversal of the remote possibility of a continuation cycle which keeps happening.

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from 28T:

Oh dear, you don't actually believe that do you? Wow you really are one of those deluded gamblers, get out of this business fast before you are destroyed

I don't make a living from gambling or trading, neither do you as far as I am aware, so chill, u ain't the one to advise on routes to be taken.

 

[GTS]

Quote from JSSPMK:

Again, I've posted observation based on actual events taking place, you both keep bringing up irrelevant info.

Your actual observations are irrelevent. Factual discussion of probability (what you call irrelevent info) is what matters.

Quote from JSSPMK:
Nobody can logically dispute the fact that no matter how many consecutive tails you get you are bound to get heads because of 50/50, this event can't not occur. 50/50 creates equal odds, which are equally good in favour of both sides of coin. Every consecutive toss creates a more remote opportunity of continuation to continue (you concurred to this yourself), therefore probability increases of an opposite coin toss happening, it's a simple reversal of the remote possibility of a continuation cycle which keeps happening.

Whooosh...it goes right over your head, doesn't it?

Every coin toss has a 50/50 chance of heads. It doesn't matter how many heads or tails in a row you just had. The probability does not increase. It stays at 50/50, every toss. You continue to contradict yourself in your own post, saying that the odds are 50/50 (which is the probability of heads or tails) but that the probability of an opposite coin toss also increases. You can't have it both ways.

Time to swallow the red pill and wake up to the real world.

 

[GTS]

Quote from 28T:

I have no doubt you don't make a living from either

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from GTS:

Your actual observations are irrelevent. Factual discussion of probability (what you call irrelevent info) is what matters.

Whooosh...it goes right over your head, doesn't it?

They may be irrelevant to you of course, tell me this, if you use a certain method when trading how do you analyse probability?

The 2nd part of your post is not worthy reply, proves inability to dispute in a logical manner.

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from 28T:

I have no doubt you don't make a living from either.. as for me.. doing nicely, thanks for inquiring

Well, in that case you are a liar, I can locate a link from one of your previous posts