Simple Profitable Method - Take 2

[Allaces]

Quote from JSSPMK:

fine, it's a mathematical fact that it is a 50/50, it's also a fact that it is a lot more unlikely to get 20 consecutive compared to 3 consecutive. That's probability, and gamblers fallacy is different to what I am saying here. You can laugh all you want, you both fail to prove me to be wrong so far

No you are lost in the gamblers fallacy that the chances of a tails is increased with 3 heads in a row... or that 3 losers in BJ increases the chances of a winner... wrong wrong wrong... you made a fool out of yourself and should have cut your losses many pages ago

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from Allaces:

No you are lost in the gamblers fallacy that the chances of a tails is increased with 3 heads in a row... or that 3 losers in BJ increases the chances of a winner... wrong wrong wrong... you made a fool out of yourself and should have cut your losses many pages ago

Open your eyes wide and read word for word that I've written, repeat if you have to. I did not say that there is any sort of Holy Grail in this, nor did I proclaim it to be a solid strategy of any sort.

You and GTS seem to be concerned way too much with my statement being in line with a gamblers fallacy, quite frankly I don't care one way or the other. All I can tell you is that if you were to do what I mentioned in the original post, then you would find that I was correct in stating what I did. You will find that a winning hand happens pretty often after so many losing hands if you stick to the rules. All you keep saying here by means of repeatition that I am lieing basically, that it can't be so, because you have previously tested a similar (similar) things with a roulette, Duh!

BTW if you use o line cross on 2 min frame (and you said you take them all) then I hope others will see that you also follow "gamblers fallacy" by assuming all of them would turn out to be profitable Why do you take them all?

 

[version77]

How many coin tosses does it take to get to an average of 50/50?

Ten? Fifty? A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand?

If things got out of whack (like 250 heads/300 tails) eventually
it would have to start reverting back to 50:50.

But when?

 

[Allaces]

Quote from JSSPMK:

All I can tell you is that if you were to do what I mentioned in the original post, then you would find that I was correct in stating what I did. You will find that a winning hand happens pretty often after so many losing hands if you stick to the rules.

No they don't, they happen exactly as often as any other time.. you propose a mathematical impossibility and you sound ignorant and childish when you stomp your feet and pout over it

 

[Allaces]

Quote from JSSPMK:



BTW if you use o line cross on 2 min frame (and you said you take them all) then I hope others will see that you also follow "gamblers fallacy" by assuming all of them would turn out to be profitable Why do you take them all?

Are you 5 years old or don't read before you post? I said the losers are small and the winners tall.. you have no hope in this business.. back to the casino for you

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from Allaces:

Are you 5 years old or don't read before you post? I said the losers small and the winners tall.. you have no hope in this business.. back to the casino for you

One thing for sure, you will always be an asshole

 

[Allaces]

Quote from JSSPMK:

One thing for sure, you will always be an asshole

Yeah well this asshole is trying to set you straight.. a bigger asshole cant admit when he is wrong and tries to blame everyone else

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from Allaces:

Yeah well this asshole is trying to set you straight.. a bigger asshole cant admit when he is wrong and tries to blame everyone else

1. I am not wrong for stating what I did;
2. I don't recall blaming anyone.

You need new glasses

 

[JSSPMK]

Quote from Allaces:

Traders make it complicated, price action is king!

Thats it, all these SCT threads and such are pointless, indicators are for amateurs and paper traders

Watch price action and trade accordingly.. simple

 

[Allaces]

Quote from JSSPMK:

1. I am not wrong for stating what I did;
2. I don't recall blaming anyone.

You need new glasses

1: You were laughingly, embarrassingly wrong as many have already told you

2: You acted like a stubborn child throwing a tantrum when people tried to help you

You need a new personality