Quote from romik:
...I must admit that for traders bearish on silver, double top in RSI is clearly seen during mid/end of May, nice signal.
I would be adding more shares to my position at some time in the future once bullish divergence/s has taken place, ideally it would be seen in 2 indicators.
Quote from Quark:
In addition, there was the wildly bullish sentiment, which set a record for ANY market. Still looks to me like we're on our way to $7, but I'm sure there'll be some bounces back up to give the "buy the dips" bulls hope so they hang on to or even add to their positions.
I see perma-bull Butler is still screaming "MANIPULATION!" It's the same old story after an exponential run up breaks down (as they always do). "I'm really right, really I am! The market HAS to go up and if it doesn't, it's someone else's fault - it's THEM, not ME!"
Butler is just another shill for precious metals dealers. To the bulls who believe, he sounds like he knows what he's talking about. I suspect he'll never say "sell", so when he fades away because the bulls who've been slaughtered don't want to hear his "reasons" any more, THEN it'll be time to think about buying.
Quote from tomcole:
Perhaps you should go look at the outflow in SLV's holdings for a clue as to why silver is dropping.

Quote from romik:
It all boils down to what you believe in? I do not daytrade/swing trade silver, so for me it is a matter of belief to a certain degree. The reason I am checking out charts is because I would add to my position, but I would like it to be as near the bottom as possible. Whether it goes to $7 or not neither of us know, I personally think it to be unlikely, though I did consider $10 range to be a short term possibility.
Quote from romik:
...In regards to manipulation theories, what's there not to believe, all data is recorded or is it not? I have confronted government regulators on quite a few occasions on various issues and they are always right and you are always wrong. So tell me this, why was Hunt's case considered manipulative and major short interest backed by commercial/government interests is ignored? What is different between the 2?
I will add another 600 shares at first sign of reversal on daily charts.
Quote from Quark:
I never cease to be amazed at how many times this same scenario plays out and in how many different markets.
Quote from Quark:
With regard to manipulation, I'll stipulate it's possible and might even be true. I don't know and I don't care. I also don't care if the moon and the stars made it go up or made it go down.
There's something strange about humans that makes us desperate to have "reasons" and "beliefs" to explain things. Pick any religion and observe the wacky bullshit people are willing to "believe" and kill other people over because someone wrote down some ludicrous blather in a book X number of years ago.
Romik, even if you had knowledge at the time of what the Hunt's were doing, I submit it simply would not have mattered. What mattered was the market got into a mania phase. Virtually everyone was bullish, and lo and behold, the precious metals dumped back to below the starting point of the exponential rise. I've heard blame placed on the Hunt's and the COMEX and there are probably other theories. The bottom line is, it was foreseeable that a collapse would happen because that is the inevitable outcome of every market that enters a mania phase.
So, I'll stay with observation of historical precedent as it relates to investor sentiment and behavior. Best wishes with your beliefs. I hope the bounce, if it comes, helps you.