Silicon Valley Bank Financial in talks to sell itself after attempts to raise capital have failed

This is what happens when you don't diverse your business. SVB failed because it's entire focused on venture capital investment and exclusively in the IT industry. If it diversifies its investment to take on a little bit on mortgages and even investment in other industries, it would've fared a lot better. Feels actually a bit bad for the bank as it actually took money from the depositors and did something good with it; it actually genuinely helped people and companies and helped build the IT industry. It didn't fail because of fraud or mismanagement but due to market condition that was really beyond its control. If it's able to toughen through the harsh time right now, it might have been able to survive. First time feeling bad for a bank. Wish someone could go in and just buy it up or at least provide some temporary relief to it just for it to carry through the tough time right now. The bank's got good ideas, has a good business model and is doing something positive.
 
What does this foretell for the banking sector?

Silicon Valley Bank Financial in talks to sell itself after attempts to raise capital have failed, sources say
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/10/sil...to-raise-capital-have-failed-sources-say.html
  • SVB Financial, parent of Silicon Valley Bank, is in talks to sell itself, sources told CNBC’s David Faber.
  • Attempts by the bank to raise capital have failed, the sources said.
  • Large financial institutions are taking a look at a potential purchase of SVB, but the a rapid outflow of deposits is making that sale process very difficult, the sources said.
SVB Financial, parent of Silicon Valley Bank, is in talks to sell itself, sources told CNBC’s David Faber.

Attempts by the bank to raise capital have failed, the sources said, and the bank has hired advisors to explore a potential sale.

Large financial institutions are taking a look at a potential purchase of SVB. However, deposits outflows are so far outpacing the sale process, making it very difficult for a realistic assessment of the bank by potential buyers to take place, the sources told Faber.

Shares of the bank fell 60% on Thursday after SVB announced a plan Wednesday evening to raise more than $2 billion in capital. The stock fell another 60% in premarket trading Friday before being halted for pending news. The shares did not open for trading with the rest of the market at 9:30 a.m. ET and were still halted.

Under the terms of a plan released Wednesday, SVB was looking to sell $1.25 billion in common stock and another $500 million of convertible preferred shares.

SVB also announced a deal with investment firm General Atlantic to sell $500 million of common stock, though that agreement was contingent on the closing of the other common stock offering, according to a securities filing.

SVB is a major bank for venture-backed companies, and cited cash burn from clients as one reason it was looking to raise additional capital.

However, rising interest rates, fears of a recession and a slowdown in the market for initial public offerings has made it harder for early stage companies to raise more cash. This has apparently led the firms to draw down on their deposits at banks like SVB.

Wall Street analysts said Thursday and Friday that the troubles at SVB seemed unlikely to spread widely throughout the banking system. Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients that SVB’s issues were “highly idiosyncratic.”

Also on Wednesday, SVB announced it sold $21 billion worth of securities to raise cash and reposition its balance sheet toward assets with a shorter duration, which are less exposed to rising interest rates. SVB estimated that it took a $1.8 billion loss on that sale.

The institution I know via via say it's probably a head fake this time, but that does not mean a new trend isn't starting, there are some number surrounding the FDIC system which means a second failure in the near future would cause more acute problems.
 
A downgrade threat triggered the failure.

Silicon Valley Bank's demise began with downgrade threat
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/...gan-with-downgrade-threat-sources-2023-03-11/

In the middle of last week, Moody's Investors Service Inc delivered alarming news to SVB Financial Group (SIVB.O), the parent of Silicon Valley Bank: the ratings firm was preparing to downgrade the bank's credit.


That phone call, described by two people familiar with the situation, began the process toward Friday's spectacular collapse of the startup-focused lender, the biggest bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis.

Friday's collapse sent jitters through global markets and walloped banking stocks. Investors worry that the Federal Reserve's aggressive interest rate increases to fight inflation are exposing vulnerabilities in the financial system.

Details of SVB's failed response to the prospect of the downgrade, reported by Reuters for the first time, show how quickly confidence in financial institutions can erode. The failure also sent shockwaves through California's startup economy, with many companies unsure how much of their deposits they can recover and worrying about how to make payroll.

The Moody's call came after the value of the bonds where SVB had parked its money fell due to the higher interest rates.

Worried the downgrade could undermine the confidence of investors and clients in the bank's financial health, SVB Chief Executive Greg Becker's team called Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) bankers for advice and flew to New York for meetings with Moody's and other ratings firms, the sources said.

The sources asked not to be identified because they are bound by confidentiality agreements.

SVB then worked on a plan over the weekend to boost the value of its holdings. It would sell more than $20 billion worth of low-yielding bonds and reinvest the proceeds in assets that deliver higher returns.

The transaction would generate a loss, but if SVB could fill that funding hole by selling shares, it would avoid a multi-notch downgrade, the sources said.

The plan backfired.

News of the share sale spooked clients, primarily technology startups, that rushed to withdraw their deposits, upending the capital raising. Regulators stepped in on Friday, shutting down the bank and putting it in receivership.

SVB, Goldman Sachs and Moody's representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

THE UNRAVELING
As SVB executives debated when to proceed with the fundraising, they heard from Moody's that the downgrade was coming this week, the sources said.

SVB sprang into action in the hopes of softening the blow.

The bank lined up private equity firm General Atlantic, which agreed to buy $500 million of the $2.25 billion stock sale, while another investor said it could not reach a deal on SVB's timeline, the sources said.

By Wednesday, SVB had sold the bond portfolio for a $1.8 billion loss.

Moody's downgraded the bank, but only by a notch because of SVB's bond portfolio sale and plan to raise capital.

Ideally, the stock sale would have been completed by before the market opened on Thursday, to avoid the sale being jeopardized by any declines in SVB's shares once news of the sale got out. But the sources said that was not an option given the tight schedule.

SVB had not done the preparatory work needed to sign confidentiality agreements with investors who would commit to a deal of such a size. Its lawyers advised the bank that investors would need at least 24 hours to digest new downbeat financial projections and complete the sale, the sources said.

Reuters could not determine why SVB did not start those preparations earlier.

SVB's stock plunged on news of the share sale, ending Thursday down 60% at $106.04. Goldman Sachs bankers still hoped they could close the sale at $95, the sources said.

Then news came of venture capital firms advising startups they had invested in to pull money out of Silicon Valley Bank for fear of an imminent bank run.

This quickly became a self-fulfilling prophecy: General Atlantic and other investors walked away and the stock sale collapsed.

General Atlantic did not respond to a request for comment.

California banking regulators closed the bank on Friday and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) receiver. The FDIC will dispose of its assets.

In the past, the regulator has struck deals quickly, sometimes over just a weekend, something that some experts said could happen with SVB.
 
The institution I know via via say it's probably a head fake this time, but that does not mean a new trend isn't starting, there are some number surrounding the FDIC system which means a second failure in the near future would cause more acute problems.

I think this upcoming week will be a pretty good indicator if there will be more failed banks or if things will stabilize & the problems are limited to SVB.

‘There’s going to be more': How Washington is bracing for bank fallout

Battle lines are already being drawn over what caused Silicon Valley Bank’s stunning demise.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/12/silicon-valley-bank-fallout-washington-00086662
 
It will be a good indicator if there is a confidence issue with investors.

assuming rationality prevails and there aren’t runs on other banks, then: If other banks fail, that will take months to work out.

I think this upcoming week will be a pretty good indicator if there will be more failed banks or if things will stabilize & the problems are limited to SVB.

‘There’s going to be more': How Washington is bracing for bank fallout

Battle lines are already being drawn over what caused Silicon Valley Bank’s stunning demise.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/12/silicon-valley-bank-fallout-washington-00086662
 
This is what happens when you don't diverse your business. SVB failed because it's entire focused on venture capital investment and exclusively in the IT industry. If it diversifies its investment to take on a little bit on mortgages and even investment in other industries, it would've fared a lot better. Feels actually a bit bad for the bank as it actually took money from the depositors and did something good with it; it actually genuinely helped people and companies and helped build the IT industry. It didn't fail because of fraud or mismanagement but due to market condition that was really beyond its control. If it's able to toughen through the harsh time right now, it might have been able to survive. First time feeling bad for a bank. Wish someone could go in and just buy it up or at least provide some temporary relief to it just for it to carry through the tough time right now. The bank's got good ideas, has a good business model and is doing something positive.
According to the woke mob, it was very diverse, LOL.

upload_2023-3-12_17-4-35.png
 
This is what happens when you don't diverse your business. SVB failed because it's entire focused on venture capital investment and exclusively in the IT industry.
It's not too hard to understand what undid SVB. Diversification isn't what brought down SVB. After all, they did put away most of their customer deposits in long dated bonds and MBS. What they didn't anticipate was that the Fed would actually raise the interest rates this much this fast. So they never bothered hedging their bets. Basically they sold naked puts and got roasted. As you can see, no protection whatsoever. Bad risk management, to say the least.

upload_2023-3-12_20-26-11.png
 
It's not too hard to understand what undid SVB. Diversification isn't what brought down SVB. After all, they did put away most of their customer deposits in long dated bonds and MBS. What they didn't anticipate was that the Fed would actually raise the interest rates this much this fast. So they never bothered hedging their bets. Basically they sold naked puts and got roasted. As you can see, no protection whatsoever. Bad risk management, to say the least.

View attachment 308738

No what they did was not selling naked puts but actually buying puts but with the wrong expiration date being that they are too far into the future when the price increase is not high enough for them to hedge against inflation IF you want to think of Treasury Notes as puts their hedge against inflation LOL.
 
Back
Top