Shroud Of Turin Determined From Time Of Jesus
- Thread starter pspr
- Start date
right ---
that is why when we asked you to present your evidence that shows plenty of science that life evolved from non life...
instead of presenting it...
you tried to change the meaning of what you wrote.
Had you said there is ongoing research into to RNA and lipids and proteins that look fruitful and might show how life evolved from non life someday... there would have never been an argument.
But no you have to keep calling me names... instead of admitting the fact you were mis informed. talk about ego filled child like actions.
that is why when we asked you to present your evidence that shows plenty of science that life evolved from non life...
instead of presenting it...
you tried to change the meaning of what you wrote.
Had you said there is ongoing research into to RNA and lipids and proteins that look fruitful and might show how life evolved from non life someday... there would have never been an argument.
But no you have to keep calling me names... instead of admitting the fact you were mis informed. talk about ego filled child like actions.
"The statement is and always was 'there is plenty of science to show how life can come from non life' "
Stop changing the words and for once in your life understand there is nothing incorrect in what I said. The reason there is any argument is entirely due to your own refusal to admit when you are wrong .
Last edited:
stop being a troll and admit you are being a troll.
given the context ---
there is no difference between asking you to show the plenty of science showing how life evolved from non life
form you quote... .
"Not only is there plenty of science showing life from non life, here's some more,
(and I note there may be a difference when you insert the words "can come" into your statement
But... those words "can come" were not in your original statement years ago.
given the context ---
there is no difference between asking you to show the plenty of science showing how life evolved from non life
form you quote... .
"Not only is there plenty of science showing life from non life, here's some more,
(and I note there may be a difference when you insert the words "can come" into your statement
But... those words "can come" were not in your original statement years ago.
Those words "can come" most certainly were in my original statement 5 years ago.
You've been changing those words ever since I first wrote them, to construct your false and deceitful arguments. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
"There is plenty of science to show how life can come from non life." ...my original quote stands
Your shitty attempt to backpedal is duly noted.Eat crow.
its worse than I remembered for you stu...
You even said this:
"There is plenty of science showing life from non life
It's called abiogenesis.
Your mindless denial does not make it go away."
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...d-in-1-paragraph.222418/page-101#post-3274948
Quote from jem:
this is the issue. I am glad I saved the page because I anticipated your troll tactics.
see that... your quote stu..
"there is plenty of science showing life from non life"
We are waiting for just one piece of scientific proof or observation from you showing life coming from non life...
[blah blah blah
stu responded...
"There is plenty of science showing life from non life
It's called abiogenesis.
Your mindless denial does not make it go away."
You even said this:
"There is plenty of science showing life from non life
It's called abiogenesis.
Your mindless denial does not make it go away."
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...d-in-1-paragraph.222418/page-101#post-3274948
Quote from jem:
this is the issue. I am glad I saved the page because I anticipated your troll tactics.
see that... your quote stu..
"there is plenty of science showing life from non life"
We are waiting for just one piece of scientific proof or observation from you showing life coming from non life...
[blah blah blah
stu responded...
"There is plenty of science showing life from non life
It's called abiogenesis.
Your mindless denial does not make it go away."
Last edited:
fkn well note it then!
The words "can come" were in my original statement
"There is plenty of science to show how life can come from non life."
The later following comment after more of your bs - "There is plenty of science showing life from non life" - is a perfectly reasonable response against anything suggesting there is no science for life from non life.
There is little if any difference between the two statements. They are both correct in context to the crap you've written.
The context changes when you by your ridiculous argument, decide to refuse all the science and plain common sense if you knew anything at all, that says it's not going to be any other way other than life from non life. Where the fck do you think life comes from if it is not from chemical reaction when all matter everywhere is chemical reaction
Any reasonable person would understand that much rather than commit the same deceit for 5 years. But of course you are not a reasonable person, that was made perfectly clear a long time ago and never been an honest one either, going by what you write.
Last edited: