Should we execute drug dealers?

Yeah futile and if you ever search the reasons:

Halliburton Corporation's : the components of the Bush-Cheney drug empire
By Michael C. Ruppert, the Wilderness Publications (independant journalist at http://www.fromthewilderness.com/),
24 October 2000

Halliburton Corporation's Brown and Root is one of the major components of the Bush-Cheney drug empire

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45c/020.html


And of course they secure their sick business with peoples tax so that we pay at least the double of the burden plus the grave consequences on society which has no cost haha !

Quote from hapaboy:

Clearly we are losing the drug war.

We've spent over $1 TRILLION on this war since the 70's, and
Efforts up till now have obviously been proven futile. So I ask, what do we have to lose other than a few drug dealers who won't peddle their filth anymore?
More...
 
Second reason: those who dare publish some truths must fear for their own life:


http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ciadrugs/McKinney_Banamex.html


http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/pandora/courage.html.



A MEMBER OF CONGRESS DEFENDS FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND FREE SPEECH IN DRUG WAR LAWSUIT

COURAGE UNBRIDLED

(Sept. 7, 2001) -- Continuing her ongoing display of courage and truth telling as the lone member of Congress willing to tackle risky issues such as Cointelpro, US inspired antics in Colombia and Africa and other illegal covert operations, Rep. Cynthia McKinney, (D) GA. Has now come out as true defender of independent journalists all over the world. FTW has previously reported on the devastating lawsuit brought by Banco Nacional de Mexico (Banamex) owner Roberto Hernandez against NarcoNews Publisher Al Giordano and Mario Menendez of the Mexican daily, "Por Esto."

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/pandora/courage.html. You can now read her letter to former Democratic National Chairman Robert Strauss who heads the powerful law firm of Aikin Gump which is bringing the suit on behalf of Banamex.

After having lost a lawsuit and an appeal in Mexico, Hernandez decided this year to throw his billions at the two journalists - who publish in Mexico - for successfully exposing his connections to drug trafficking on the Yucatan Peninsula and his relations with politicians including Bill Clinton, Vicente Fox and George W Bush. He brought the suit, widely regarded as meritless, in New York City. If successful, that would have meant that an Internet journalist in any country might successfully be sued in any other country in the world where the legal system was friendlier to the plaintiff. Such a move would have us all travelling the world to defend our stories.

In May, Citigroup announced that it was buying Banamex for $12.5 billion dollars.

Now, Cynthia McKinney speaks out - against money and power - to defend our most precious of liberties - freedom of speech and of the press. FTW encourages its readers to contact McKinney and express support for her actions. You can use the phone, a fax or send an email:

202-225-1605 -- phone
202-226-0691 -- fax
cymck@mail.house.gov -- email

 
Quote from candletrader:

I voted Yes, execute the bastids... but only for hard drugs, not for soft drugs...
More...
By gum, if Candle and I can agree on something, ANYTHING is possible. :)

(This of course depends on whether or not brother Candle is being serious or throwing another knuckleball). :D
 
No comments from the pro-legalization crowd lately, and the numbers are going up for executing the scumbag drug dealers. Is it possible China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore have the right idea?
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

legalization is the ONLY WAY to solve the "supposed" drug problem.

best,

surfer
More...
I appreciate your opinion, but please address the questions I posed at the top of page 13 and repeated on page 14 of this thread.
 
Quote from hapaboy:

The poll results don't surprise me at all, and I take no umbrage that they are what they are. I have proposed something radical, and radical ideas usually receive knee-jerk reactions and emotional feedback. It's to be expected. And who knows, the arguments for legalization may even make me change my mind. They may even eventually change yours.

Thus I wouldn't go as far as to suggest dgabriel would fudge with the poll results, freealways.

Besides, as a highly-qualified moderator, model of civility, and epitome of the conduct in ET's forums and threads, the very thought of doing so surely would not even enter his mind.
More...
I don't understand why certain posters (Vinny also comes to mind), when their poll is not going their way, assume that a moderator has altered it unfavorably to them?! Maybe, just maybe, the majority of people at ET who voted simply didn't agree with you. What a concept. BTW, dgabriel does not have access to modify the poll results in the Chit Chat forum.
 
Quote from hapaboy:


You're definitely right that we have nothing to talk about since you have given us nothing to talk about save insults.

I think I expressed a little more than insults in my second post to you

You still have not illuminated your stance, only that the one I have proposed is ridiculous to you, which I have really have no problem with at all.

Of course it is ridiculous, your mentality and stance is no fucking better than the Communist Regimes of Central Europe and/or The Nazis that paved their road to paradise with bodies of anyone who opposed or caused a threat to their conception 'of a better tommorrow'... Yes Hapa imo you are no better than a Nazi...

But character assaults on someone you've never had a discourse with, not even on a previous thread, is not the proper way to begin an intelligent debate.

Character assualts? I was stating the obvious -- and we have actualy had one other discourse, at the time it was under the handle 'te' and I am almost positive I called you a moron then -- remember that little riddle about the monks that made no sense to your feeble brain until danny boy broke it down OVER AND OVER again for you?

So if you want us to just ignore each other, that's way fine with me.

Fine with me bubble head consider yourself ignored and don't even bother responding to this, because i will not be able to read it
More...
 
ROFL!

Fluidity, te, Publias, or whatever handle you happen to have to hide behind nowadays, your rant not only makes no sense whatsoever but illustrates that you are capable only of name-calling, not debate.

I'd invite you to explain how advocating capital punishment for drug dealers is comparable to being a Nazi and/or Communist, or to try and answer the questions I posed about legalization, but it is clear you are fully incapable of rationally explaining your position - if you even have one.

And I don't recall the monk thing. It must have been either entirely forgettable, or, given your inability to be even minimally coherent, wholly confusing.

I truly do hope I am on ignore and you don't read this. Silence from you is indeed a blessing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top