Hey folks, why don’t us make any labels, we all smart enough to make ours point in polite way.PRICK!!!
Someone who looks at the deaths and doesn't see any of the harm being done.
Easily led sheep!!
Hey folks, why don’t us make any labels, we all smart enough to make ours point in polite way.PRICK!!!
Someone who looks at the deaths and doesn't see any of the harm being done.
Easily led sheep!!
Lots of assumptions there. Most of them wrong. High level epidemiologists say for the elderly and vulnerable to self isolate. Rest of us go back to work. If the healthy are back to work, how does it matter if the vulnerable are at home self isolating anyway? Whether the healthy stay at home or not, the vulnerable can stay at home. So it doesn't matterNobody knows what we should do.... not enough data yet.
Opening up now is a political guess... unless it's been decided that those who become very ill and/or die will just be accepted as "collateral damage to the economy".
WTF, your the 1 bleeting on about your old man and you can't lose him.
When you lose your job and get forces into poverty don't come crying to me.
More lives are being lost from the Lockdown than the lockdown is saving from the virus in the UK, do you not understand this ??
You are literally KILLING PEOPLE while achieving very little or maybe even nothing.
Does only your opinion right, is that happening you will accept other if it does not oppose yours?But your obviously not smart, not capable of making weighted decisions, but millions of scared little you sheep are demanding that wayyyy more harm for very little lives saved, to be done.
More lives are being lost from the Lockdown than the lockdown is saving from the virus in the UK, do you not understand this ??
You are literally KILLING PEOPLE while achieving very little or maybe even nothing.
Lots of assumptions there. Most of them wrong. High level epidemiologists say for the elderly and vulnerable to self isolate. Rest of us go back to work. If the healthy are back to work, how does it matter if the vulnerable are at home self isolating anyway? Whether the healthy stay at home or not, the vulnerable can stay at home. So it doesn't matter
The fatality rate is very low. The models were all wrong. Revised downward many times, by many multiples. Hospitalizations, intubations deaths all overstated by 4 - 20 TIMES.
Lots of assumptions there. Most of them wrong. High level epidemiologists say for the elderly and vulnerable to self isolate. Rest of us go back to work. If the healthy are back to work, how does it matter if the vulnerable are at home self isolating anyway? Whether the healthy stay at home or not, the vulnerable can stay at home. So it doesn't matter
The fatality rate is very low. The models were all wrong. Revised downward many times, by many multiples. Hospitalizations, intubations deaths all overstated by 4 - 20 TIMES.
There is no data in USA because there is no testing. Fatalities are much overstated as nurses and docs are encouraged to write Covid19 on every death certificate for Federal money. Fatality number is the same. As positive case rate grows exponentially (denominator) and fatality number stays same, fatality death rate drops dramatically (fatality % = # of deaths / positive case rate). Studies coming out of Cali and Chicago say anywhere from 4% to 50% of population already been infected and developed antibodies. Number of deaths stays the same. So the real death rate is basically like a bad flu. Around 100k a year.
Many people already have the antibodies.
Im not saying house arrest. Im just saying those that want to live their lives, can. And do. The vulnerable can self isolate and wait for Bill Gates "miracle vaccine". None of this is legal anyways. America cant just throw away the Constitution indefinitely cause people are scared.Yeah... everybody over 60 sequestered in "house arrest" while the rest of the country gets on with their lives. Though on some level the notion seems to have a bit of merit, but don't see that playing well in America.
Yeah... everybody over 60 sequestered in "house arrest" while the rest of the country gets on with their lives. Though on some level the notion seems to have a bit of merit, but don't see that playing well in America.
Regarless, I think we've got a period of depression-like weakness....
Over the last decade, America has lived, borrowed, spent, and invested "balls out". Doubt we'll be getting back to anything like that for quite a long time, if ever.
Im not saying house arrest. Im just saying those that want to live their lives, can. And do. The vulnerable can self isolate and wait for Bill Gates "miracle vaccine". None of this is legal anyways. America cant just throw away the Constitution indefinitely cause people are scared.
We already have a proven treatment - hydroxycholorquine + azyithromicin + zinc. Works well in patients before intubation. After, not so much. Pushes zinc into the cells which acts as a protective shield preventing virus from entering.
Im not saying house arrest. Im just saying those that want to live their lives, can. And do. The vulnerable can self isolate and wait for Bill Gates "miracle vaccine". None of this is legal anyways. America cant just throw away the Constitution indefinitely cause people are scared.
We already have a proven treatment - hydroxycholorquine + azyithromicin + zinc. Works well in patients before intubation. After, not so much. Pushes zinc into the cells which acts as a protective shield preventing virus from entering.