Quote from r-in:
Seriously? Why wasn't commander and loser Bill Clinton tossed on his ass? How what he did doesn't meet the same standard of national security risk? How about JFK? You know the democrat god JFK. I actually do think Petraeus is a moron for this and the potential for risk that he obviously couldn't get through to his little head. At the same time common sense and probably a little work by the FBI would be able to check if there was an actual risk, or just another dumb ass. And yea, I say that despite his service to our country. Because you serve doesn't make you exempt from being a dumb ass, and being labeled as one. I am a little tired of over excessive hero worship for everyone in this country who has done anything and in some cases nothing.
I will also say there is pretty high likelihood of this coming through when it did, just as he was supposed to testify about Benghazi, and the next guy in line to testify may very well be a chimp who does what he is told. Not uncommon if you have worked in this world.
We were exposed with JFK. He admitted to a teenage girl he was having an affair with, that he'd "Rather be red than dead". !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That in a nutshell was the President's personal, inner-most feelings on the issue.
Was this teenage girl so hardened that the Russians could never have possibly gotten this admission from her?
After that, 250 million Americans would have woke up in much greater danger than they did the day before. Damn.