Should MSNBC change their name to "F*** Romney Channel" till election season is over?

[Max E.]

Indeed, Buffet did nurture most of the companies he was involved in after he got his start by taking all the cash out of a failing textile company, but that doesnt change the fact that he engaged in what you dumb fuck lefties would consider "vulture capitalism" with a failing textile company to start his career. It is right there in black and white, the company was not viable, so he got as much cash as he possibly could out of it, so he could invest in new companies. Look it up yourself if you want. This is straight from CNBC's mouth.

You hear that sound? That is the sound of your weak ass argument about bain slowly going down the drain.....

Quote from Brass:

Buffett nurtured the companies he invested in, with little or no exception.

At this point, Max, you're just phoning it in.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

Indeed, Buffet did nurture most of the companies he was involved in after he got his start by taking all the cash out of a failing textile company, but that doesnt change the fact that he engaged in what you dumb fuck lefties would consider "vulture capitalism" with a failing textile company to start his career. It is right there in black and white, the company was not viable, so he got as much cash as he possibly could out of it, so he could invest in new companies. Look it up yourself if you want.

He bought the mill in the '60s and sold it in the '80s. It was one of very few businesses that didn't pan out as hoped. You are relying on an exception to make a point, along with some choice swearing? I gather these are desperate times.

A helpful suggestion: try to get your education from sources other than slant pieces. You're already walking funny.

 

[Max E.]

WOW, you got me, i really should quit using right wing networks like CNBC who clearly have a vendetta against Buffet.

Quote from Brass:

A helpful suggestion: try to get your education from sources other than slant pieces. You're already walking funny.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

WOW, you got me, i really should quit using right wing networks like CNBC who clearly have a vendetta against Buffet.

Were they slamming him? Or is that just you?

Again:

Quote from Brass:

...You are relying on an exception to make a point, along with some choice swearing? I gather these are desperate times...

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Brass:

Were they slamming him? Or is that just you?

They werent slamming him, and im not slamming him either. They were doing a biography on his life. Im merely pointing out the fact that the practices the dems are trying to demonize have been in play by all kinds of left wing heros for a long time, and it sure as hell didnt originate with Romney.

Dems will eat shit if they pursue this issue.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

They werent slamming him, and im not slamming him either. They were doing a biography on his life. Im merely pointing out the fact that the practices the dems are trying to demonize have been in play by all kinds of left wing heros for a long time, and it sure as hell didnt originate with Romney.

Dems will eat shit if they pursue this issue.

It was Gingrich, a Republican, who did the hit piece. And no one in his right mind would compare Buffett with a corporate raider, which Romney may or may not have been to some extent or another.

Go ahead. Have another bite.

 

[Max E.]

I cant help but come to the conclusion that you are "fucking with me" at this point. You have just went full circle.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/peJWxqEVXPY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Quote from Brass:

It was Gingrich, a Republican, who did the hit piece. And no one in his right mind would compare Buffett with a corporate raider, which Romney may or may not have been to some extent or another.

Go ahead. Have another bite.

 

[Fractals 'R Us]

People on the left are so smart, just ask them! Why aren't they 1%'ers?

 

[Brass]

Quote from Epic:

Agreed. When everyone is all worked up and frothing at the mouth, it is hard to determine whether the baby is going out with the bath water.

It is very easy to say that anything the government can do, the private sector can do better. But that isn't necessarily the real world. Take for example the idea of shelters for battered and raped women. This is a service that everyone expects to be available if needed, but the private sector in my opinion doesn't adequately address the far reaching nature of the situation. The private sector doesn't have a profit stream there. Imagine a women's shelter checking someone in at the counter covered in cuts and bruises, and needing a pelvic exam. The clerk then asks for a credit card to cover any incidental cost of care. When the woman indicates that her abusive husband doesn't allow her a credit card, the shelter then refers her to a homeless shelter down the street for a place to stay and a warm meal.

In reality, services like that are expected in a wealthy society, and charitable donations just don't provide for it because everyone thinks that it won't happen to them. In my opinion, the burden of taking care of such circumstances should be spread across the entire population as much as possible.

I wish I could have expressed it half as well as you just did.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

I cant help but come to the conclusion that you are "fucking with me" at this point. You have just went full circle.

I'm afraid that's your own mind having its way with you.