Should I join this prop firm or keep trading for myself?

That right there should be your answer to stay where you're at.

I've once lived in the summer in NY (lived with a college buddy) and WI (Madeline Island with a relative) although never spent any time in Milwaukee WI...

Cost of living and quality of life is a big issue for me. I'm not a big fan of Milwaukee but NYC I could never reside in reference to the city itself.

The issue is that you're asking the opinions of anonymous people that know nothing about your lifestyle/costs in Milwaukee in comparison to your lifestyle/costs in New York City (assuming you're not talking about some suburb in the state of New York). Also, you mention nothing about your family/relationships.

Without the info about family/relationships, Milwaukee has the edge and I think a trial run in NYC for a summer would be enough for you to make a better decision. Thus, a full year not needed. Yet, make sure you make arrangements in Milwaukee just in case you decide to return. For example, if you own your house/condo...sublease it for 1 year or rent it for one year.

If you're renting, you can make arrangements with your landlord to only sublet it on a one year term.

What's your cost of living in Milwaukee per year ?

What will be your cost of living in New York City per year ?

wrbtrader

30 and single. I think NYC would be more fun, but yes rent will be a lot higher. I pay $1400/month for a 1 bedroom here and it's nice but I actually don't need much right now and I don't make the full use of it. In NYC the same type of place will likely be 2.5-3X the cost. But I can go for a place that's lower quality than my current place but $2.5-3k a month in Manhattan. Or maybe try some other borough if it's decent. I would not be making a commitment to NY long term initially and I really don't want too nice of a place starting out there if I move.
 
30 and single. I think NYC would be more fun, but yes rent will be a lot higher. I pay $1400/month for a 1 bedroom here and it's nice but I actually don't need much right now and I don't make the full use of it. In NYC the same type of place will likely be 2.5-3X the cost. But I can go for a place that's lower quality than my current place but $2.5-3k a month in Manhattan. Or maybe try some other borough if it's decent. I would not be making a commitment to NY long term initially and I really don't want too nice of a place starting out there if I move.

Have you looked at the prop firms in Chicago?
 
Have you looked at the prop firms in Chicago?

I have but as far as I know they are mainly derivatives market makers. Very different than what I do. Also, I'm not a STEM person or an Ivy league grad so I don't think they'd be interested. If there are equity prop shops in Chicago still around (I heard Tower Hill is closed?) with no capital contribution required, I would like to know though.
 
I can't believe that in this day and age there are firms that will not take on profitable trader remotely. Is that by itself not a red flag (together with their "open" environment)?
 
I hope you understand that the "cost of living" is not just rent/mortgage. You know exactly how much your montly expenses are in Milwaukee and its not $1400 per month via only using your rent.

As for your edge, you then know what type of market conditions it performs well and what type of market condition it has poor performance. For example, if your performance slows in the summer months...the summer may not be the best time to relocate to NYC unless you plan to downgrade your trading in the summer so that you can "adapt" to living in NYC.

For example, when I relocated from one country to another country...I used stats of my trading to tell me when would be the best time to do such. I did it during the months when I tend to perform poorly in comparison to other months. Therefore, when I relocated...I didn't trade for 3 months because it was during a time period I tend to not do well. Instead, I used those 3 months to adapt to my new surroundings and just enjoy life.

Overall the cost of living was cheaper but my mortgage was 2x higher.

wrbtrader
 
I can't believe that in this day and age there are firms that will not take on profitable trader remotely. Is that by itself not a red flag (together with their "open" environment)?

Depends on the definition of "profitable" and capital and what such is to the firm.

wrbtrader
 
Very much disagree. If active trading is 'value arbitrage' and acts as the grease between buyers and sellers to join value assessments 'sooner' (with your capital in play than without), the process of injecting *more* arbitrage capital into that market will quickly dilute the usefulness AND the rewards to being there.

Depending on your actual trading pattern, if you give me a slice of your trades, I don't *have to* deduce your exact rules, I just have to get close. And then, if you've got a $10m/day market, and I waltz in with my pretty-close $1m basket, I've just tapped 10% of your income, just from looking over your shoulder. (And this is assuming a linear effect, which in practice, it's not...)

if you can deduce other people's trade secret from their trades, how can james simons keep his method secret so long since at least some people in the clearing house or brokerage firm have access to medallion's trades.
 
They're in New York. Traders get $10-$20 million in buying power (compared to my $800k in buying power I'm working with currently). I can do a lot more with that kind of buying power, but they weren't clear on the max daily loss limit. They said they just increase it as you get more established and they get more comfortable with how you trade. They said it's normal for some of their bigger traders to go through 6 figure drawdowns. This just what they told me, maybe they're exaggerating or maybe it's for real.

This is a red flag for me. My experience relates to prop futures, but I suspect equities would be similar. Your contract should specify the max daily loss limit, so you know if it is even worth considering.

As a new trader walking in the door, you are starting out with a sub account of $0. Most firms won't let you swing big size off the bat in case you go negative and then walk. They will want you to start small and build up a buffer in the account. Your daily loss limit will relate to how much is in your sub account, and therefore how much the firm is risking (ideally zero for them).

When you think about it, you are still trading 'your' money, as your percentage dollars of the sub account is being risked.

They may start you with a daily loss limit much less than you are trading with now. It could then take much longer to size up to a point where you are even matching your current income. That is why I would want this in the contract.

Also, having your trade history visible to the team sounds like a bad idea. There is no upside in it for you. People might work out what you are doing and reduce your edge, and there is also the psychological impact knowing that every trade you make is being scrutinized. This might mess with your head if you are used to trading lone wolf style.

Prop trading can be great with the right arrangement, but my recommendation is to be very careful who you do business with it.
 
This is a red flag for me. My experience relates to prop futures, but I suspect equities would be similar. Your contract should specify the max daily loss limit, so you know if it is even worth considering.

As a new trader walking in the door, you are starting out with a sub account of $0. Most firms won't let you swing big size off the bat in case you go negative and then walk. They will want you to start small and build up a buffer in the account. Your daily loss limit will relate to how much is in your sub account, and therefore how much the firm is risking (ideally zero for them).

When you think about it, you are still trading 'your' money, as your percentage dollars of the sub account is being risked.

They may start you with a daily loss limit much less than you are trading with now. It could then take much longer to size up to a point where you are even matching your current income. That is why I would want this in the contract.

Also, having your trade history visible to the team sounds like a bad idea. There is no upside in it for you. People might work out what you are doing and reduce your edge, and there is also the psychological impact knowing that every trade you make is being scrutinized. This might mess with your head if you are used to trading lone wolf style.

Prop trading can be great with the right arrangement, but my recommendation is to be very careful who you do business with it.

Very good points. You highlighted my main concerns here.
 
Back
Top