Should Female marines be required to do at least three pull-ups?

Quote from nitro:

This southpaw can probably knock out many of the pussies on this website.


You're kinda stating the obvious...

A trained fighter of either sex can knockout 99+% of the population, male and female.

The only iffy prop is the small fighter/very big male combo...
 
Quote from blah12345678:

You're kinda stating the obvious...

A trained fighter of either sex can knockout 99+% of the population, male and female.

The only iffy prop is the small fighter/very big male combo...
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8ic2k2P_FG0?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/R3OgpLmtQuE?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Quote from nitro:

This southpaw can probably knock out many of the pussies on this website.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Di6Zwc21Zbw?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Doubt it. Size matters on the ground. The first thing men always do when losing a standup fight against a smaller opponent is rush, take down, and beat down. She would probably do OK against a knockout gamer, however.
 
Quote from ElCubano:

it doesn't matter how big and strong you are. If your chin is made of glass you going down.

Not if the bigger foe tackles the smaller fighter, and knocks them off their feet. Smaller fighters off their feet are at a serious disadvantage due to weight.

Smaller fighters need room to move and gain advantage from their agility, quickness, and greater endurance.
 
Quote from nitro:

That is silly. What women mean they want to be treated equally may have gotten way out of control, for example in this case. But in SPIRIT, what they meant is they wanted to vote, they wanted to enjoy sex without the risk of pregnancy, they wanted the same pay for the same achievement, they wanted access to education, they wanted access to work so that in case they were stuck with some asshole, their children wouldn't starve and they could go on to support themselves.

Should a woman be treated IDENTICALLY to a man in the armed forces? Like every other question asked in history, the answer is dynamic and depends on when in history you ask it. The more technological warfare becomes, the less physical differences will matter. In fact, advanced technological warfare is the very reason that women are in the armed forces to begin with.

Equality to DO THE JOB.
In other words...they want to be equal in the places that benefits them, but want to be treated as the weaker sex when it benefits them? Gotcha!
 
Quote from STC Capital:

In other words...they want to be equal in the places that benefits them, but want to be treated as the weaker sex when it benefits them? Gotcha!


BINGO!
 
In high school and college, I knew about 15 females in the ROTC program. Those that could do +10 pull-ups, +20 push ups, excelling in running distance and so on along with being competitive...

They were the ones that were also athletes on the high school or university sports team (e.g. soccer, softball, track & field, judo, rowing, volleyball and so on). In contrast, the ones that couldn't pass simple physical test requirements like pull-ups...they were the none athletes (didn't do sports).

Maybe the military should look more closely at the athletic background of those they allow to join via using it as a screening requirement.
 
Back
Top