you say the facts are compelling but the presentation repels you to disregard the facts?
Should fat people be forced to get a lap band procedure?
- Thread starter OPTIONAL777
- Start date
you say the facts are compelling but the presentation repels you to disregard the facts?
so you say truth or the fact is secondary to your personal fondness for the source?
Imagine, someone disinterested in facts...
this is what you
say
truth or the fact is secondary to my personal fondness for the source.
good thing you never met Jim Jones, you wouldn't be here
even if the same present FACT rather than fiction?
personally, i think you are FOS
what you really don't like is being shown that you are WRONG
which you clearly are
Quote from Mom0/pH0x:
i become disinterested in investigating whether or not the claim is a fact or fiction. if i feel that some portion of the argument is questionable or flimsy, i dont want to go throught the process of discussing my concerns and objections because it will mean talking to an evangelical childish princess who says shit that crap above
how can i be wrong, i didnt make an assertion, therès nothing to be wrong about....
Pants on fire...
...and I quote you:
"...causes me to become disinterested in the facts."
...and I quote you:
"...causes me to become disinterested in the facts."
good find.
what a disingenuous idiot.
hey momo try standing toe to toe with the facts for once in your life
You could have said something like:
"When someone comes on too strong and is nearly evangelical on an issue, I tend to tune them out on that issue. Not that I ignore the facts, but rather I lose interested in discussing the facts."
That would have been reasonable.
However, to say that "...causes me to become disinterested in the facts."
That is not reasonable...
A person who becomes disinterested in facts, becomes interested in non fact, which is what you do repetitively here at ET. You spout non fact, make illogical arguments, appeals to mob rule...
Bottom line...you are a "pants on fire" personality...
A true critical thinker would never, ever say they are not interested in the facts of an issue...despite the manner in which the issue was presented.
Bigots say things like you say, because the don't like the person, the ignore the facts and just go with their emotions of distaste.
You won't accept the fact of course, but you outed yourself today as a person who is not interested in facts...but rather only interested in your own judgment and opinions not supported by facts...
"When someone comes on too strong and is nearly evangelical on an issue, I tend to tune them out on that issue. Not that I ignore the facts, but rather I lose interested in discussing the facts."
That would have been reasonable.
However, to say that "...causes me to become disinterested in the facts."
That is not reasonable...
A person who becomes disinterested in facts, becomes interested in non fact, which is what you do repetitively here at ET. You spout non fact, make illogical arguments, appeals to mob rule...
Bottom line...you are a "pants on fire" personality...
A true critical thinker would never, ever say they are not interested in the facts of an issue...despite the manner in which the issue was presented.
Bigots say things like you say, because the don't like the person, the ignore the facts and just go with their emotions of distaste.
You won't accept the fact of course, but you outed yourself today as a person who is not interested in facts...but rather only interested in your own judgment and opinions not supported by facts...