Shot Across the Bow: Bernanke Warns of 'Private Equity & Leveraged Buyout Risks'

Quote from ByLoSellHi:

I could make a rational argument that the bid for TXU was ridiculous.
More...

that was one i was thinking that is getting us in that direction...one that i know that would be over the top would be if HD was taken private at a big premium
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

I'm not whining, sir. I think you might be served good in looking up the definition. I asked a question of a poster who seemingly posts all of these end of the world type posts on a consistant basis. Whenever I see a "ByLoSellHi" post, I am virtually guarenteed it is a "the end is nigh" type post.

Come to think of it, you've actually been a perma bear as of late as well. So I guess I should not be surprised you are here calling me names in response. The "Big Dog & Me Too" act is quite entertaining. Which one of you is which?
More...

Get over yourself.

Again, if you don't like what Bernanke is saying, don't read the article. Write a letter to Michael Bloomberg while you're at it, and tell him to instruct his journalists not to report on Bernanke's speeches.

Thanks for the remarkable yet bizarre implication that Bernanke speaks for me. I relish that kind of influence.

Hey Ben Bernanke: Cut interest rates so I can sell some of my developed lots.

-Let's see if he can hear me.
 
Quote from otcstockfund:

that was one i was thinking that is getting us in that direction...one that i know that would be over the top would be if HD was taken private at a big premium
More...

HD or Radioshack getting bought out at a 35% premium - that would signal me.
 
Quote from SiSePuede!:

How can you be a "perma bear" only lately? Wouldn't perma denote pemanent?

You're whining because you're complaining about the poster and not the content of what he posts. I'm pretty sure one could call that whining...if you can't properly use the definition of "perma(permanent" why would you have any credibility in lecturing on the use of the word whining which is far more subjective.

My point which you didn't get through the tears in your eyes was that perhaps BLSH finds those articles interesting as I do. I have 90% of my money Long in stocks I'm bullish on...so maybe I'm a semi(10%)bear but I don't think you're smart enough to figure that out.

Sorry to have wasted your time teaching you English and pointing out that you're being a little bitch. :D
More...

Asking a question is not whining. What you are doing about me is actually a bit closer to whining. Quite a bit.

But have it your way. You and BLSH can continue your dozens of posts, all revolving around the same general subject, all with your virtual sign waving about the economical apocalypse. To most of us, it's essentially spam.

The odd thing is the artcle isn't bad, actually. It's just the fact that the same ol' doom and gloom crowd continues to harp about it (doom and gloom) that annoys the shit out of everyone here.

As for being long, I highly doubt that. People who behave like you do are doing so because it is a psychological reaction to losing (money in this case). If you were actually 90% long, you would just be happy the market is going up and you wouldn't want that to end.

But you never answered my question. Which one of you is Big dog and which one is "me too"?

bigdog.jpg


I'm guessing you're "me too". The little dog always yaps the loudest.
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

Asking a question is not whining. What you are doing about me is actually a bit closer to whining. Quite a bit.

But have it your way. You and BLSH can continue your dozens of posts, all revolving around the same general subject, all with your virtual sign waving about the economical apocalypse. To most of us, it's essentially spam.

The odd thing is the artcle isn't bad, actually. It's just the fact that the same ol' doom and gloom crowd continues to harp about it (doom and gloom) that annoys the shit out of everyone here.

As for being long, I highly doubt that. People who behave like you do are doing so because it is a psychological reaction to losing (money in this case). If you were actually 90% long, you would just be happy the market is going up and you wouldn't want that to end.

But you never answered my question. Which one of you is Big dog and which one is "me too"?
More...


So, what you're saying is that Bernanke's comments are not notable enough and don't warrant posting here, and/or Bloomberg shouldn't have reported on this speech, and/or I shouldn't post Bloomberg articles covering the Federal Reserve Chariman's comments about the the "risks" of frothy LBO deals?

Why are you ducking the point?

Quote from ByLoSellHi:

Get over yourself.

Again, if you don't like what Bernanke is saying, don't read the article. Write a letter to Michael Bloomberg while you're at it, and tell him to instruct his journalists not to report on Bernanke's speeches.

Thanks for the remarkable yet bizarre implication that Bernanke speaks for me. I relish that kind of influence.

Hey Ben Bernanke: Cut interest rates so I can sell some of my developed lots.

-Let's see if he can hear me.
More...
 
You choose to post the article. It is the consistancy in the style of the article you are posting that I'm referring to. Not the actual article itself.
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

Asking a question is not whining. What you are doing about me is actually a bit closer to whining. Quite a bit.

But have it your way. You and BLSH can continue your dozens of posts, all revolving around the same general subject, all with your virtual sign waving about the economical apocalypse. To most of us, it's essentially spam.

The odd thing is the artcle isn't bad, actually. It's just the fact that the same ol' doom and gloom crowd continues to harp about it (doom and gloom) that annoys the shit out of everyone here.

As for being long, I highly doubt that. People who behave like you do are doing so because it is a psychological reaction to losing (money in this case). If you were actually 90% long, you would just be happy the market is going up and you wouldn't want that to end.
More...

No more english lessons? :D

I'm pointing out that your'e being a bitch, sorry that bothers you.

I'm totally long 90% of my money...you can doubt it all you want. I'm bearish on the economy, so what? I'm still long small caps and gold stocks which are rather outside the market's general trend 95% of the time. There are many ways to be bullish outside of indices dummy. Do you need a lesson in that too? Do you even know what breadth is? Lately, even thoug the indices have gone up, you could have not been making any money due to terrible breadth in the markets.

Good luck. :p
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

You choose to post the article. It is the consistancy in the style of the article you are posting that I'm referring to. Not the actual article itself.
More...



I post maybe 3 or 4 Bloomberg articles a week. This is one of the most notable, ones, IMO, as it has to do with potential Fed Policy regarding excessive LBO activity, which could have monetary policy implications.

Ask Makloda or EqtTrdr if I ever remark on their 30 a day '100% up room to go' bullish one liners. I don't. It doesn't bother me. I could care less who is posting what.

It doesn't bother me at all.

Why do substantive articles trouble you so?
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

You choose to post the article. It is the consistancy in the style of the article you are posting that I'm referring to. Not the actual article itself.
More...

So news is all the same? Nothing changes? Bernanke has been saying the same thing for a long time now? Were you going to post the article?

BuyLo, you should be ashamed of yourself for posting news about the Fed and the economy...you're a disgrace to people who think! :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top