I think the play is buy deep in the money, Puts.
GO FOR IT! Just have a plan if things go against you.I think the play is buy deep in the money, Puts.
I'm not doing it yet, it has more room to run on the upside... The time is not right yet.
I'm not doing it yet, it has more room to run on the upside... The time is not right yet.
Every leveraged ETF I've tested has almost zero tracking error when you account for the management fee. If you read the prospectus you'll find that they promise to match 2X, 3X, or -1X of the daily return of their underlying index. Which they all do almost exactly with no tracking error. If you expect it to return the 2X/3X/-1X of the underlying over a period of more than one day you'll most likely be disappointed, but that's not tracking error, it's user error on the part of the person who didn't read or understand the prospectus.i have never heard of a leveraged etf that is not subject to tracking error. why should this one be an exception?
use of the term tracking error was the wrong term. my intention was to refer to percentage moves which make leveraged etfs unsuitable as buy and hold instruments.Every leveraged ETF I've tested has almost zero tracking error when you account for the management fee. If you read the prospectus you'll find that they promise to match 2X, 3X, or -1X of the daily return of their underlying index. Which they all do almost exactly with no tracking error. If you expect it to return the 2X/3X/-1X of the underlying over a period of more than one day you'll most likely be disappointed, but that's not tracking error, it's user error on the part of the person who didn't read or understand the prospectus.