Short selling at the Chicago Stock Exchange

[MarkBrown]

https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_42225.pdf

fake ass poopy

On the Elite Trader forums, there has been significant debate surrounding the credibility of "Destriero," a well-known user who frequently discusses advanced trading strategies, particularly in options.

However, many other members question his claims of profitability. They argue that Destriero frequently posts vague screenshots or statements without providing concrete proof, such as verified trading statements. Some suggest that his claims of significant trading success remain unsubstantiated, labeling him as an "internet poser" or even accusing him of aggressively defending himself when challenged.

In summary, while Destriero has a following that appreciates his market knowledge, there's no verifiable evidence on the forum that confirms his long-term profitability or massive success as a trader.

 

[poopy]

You can cut and paste all you want but Stan wasn’t even the largest shareholder within his family in that clown org Spyglass BD. Wealthy family involved in some local residential RE, small time charitable org and the Rainbow CPO had 30 clients before it was shuttered. 30 clients and less than $20MM in AUM and accepting clients at $100K but it was a hedge account for the Waltons? ah hahahahaha.

 

[MarkBrown]

You can cut and paste all you want but Stan wasn’t even the largest shareholder within his family in that clown org Spyglass BD. Wealthy family involved in some local residential RE, small time charitable org and the Rainbow CPO had 30 clients before it was shuttered. 30 clients and less than $20MM in AUM and accepting clients at $100K but it was a hedge account for the Waltons? ah hahahahaha.

rotfl

On the Elite Trader forums, "Destriero" has faced challenges from several users over the years. A notable number of forum participants have questioned the legitimacy of his trading claims, especially his purported large gains and expertise. Posters such as "@DiceAreCast" and others have criticized him for failing to provide verifiable evidence of his success, often pointing out that screenshots or anecdotal claims are insufficient proof. Some have expressed skepticism regarding his behavior, suggesting that his aggressive responses to criticism may indicate insecurity rather than confidence in his abilities.

poopy - posts vague screenshots or statements without providing concrete proof, such as verified trading statements. Some suggest that his claims of significant trading success remain unsubstantiated, labeling him as an "internet poser".

 

[arturo100]

rotfl

On the Elite Trader forums, "Destriero" has faced challenges from several users over the years. A notable number of forum participants have questioned the legitimacy of his trading claims, especially his purported large gains and expertise. Posters such as "@DiceAreCast" and others have criticized him for failing to provide verifiable evidence of his success, often pointing out that screenshots or anecdotal claims are insufficient proof. Some have expressed skepticism regarding his behavior, suggesting that his aggressive responses to criticism may indicate insecurity rather than confidence in his abilities.

poopy - posts vague screenshots or statements without providing concrete proof, such as verified trading statements. Some suggest that his claims of significant trading success remain unsubstantiated, labeling him as an "internet poser".

I didn't like either the way destriero posted, but I should say that he, at least once, showed gains he could get using his system on collective2...may be someone can dig out this post.

 

[MarkBrown]

I didn't like either the way destriero posted, but I should say that he, at least once, showed gains he could get using his system on collective2...may be someone can dig out this post.

be informed this business is full of people like destriero no one is legit without auditing.

Collective2 trading systems are not audited by third-party independent auditors. Collective2 provides a platform for developers to publish and share their trading strategies, and while it tracks the performance of these strategies, the results shown are typically hypothetical and not verified by external, independent auditors.

Collective2 does disclose real trading results from users who mirror trading systems, the lack of third-party auditing means that there's no independent verification of these results. This absence of independent auditing leaves the platform open to skepticism, as there’s no guarantee that the results displayed are accurate or free from manipulation.

Collective2 tracks and reports the performance of trading strategies, including both hypothetical and real trading data. However, since there’s no third-party verification of these results, it’s possible that system developers could misrepresent performance, even though Collective2 emphasizes that they strive to provide accurate data. The platform relies on its internal tracking mechanisms, which may not be as robust as an external audit by an independent entity.

The CFTC requires platforms that present hypothetical trading results to make clear disclosures that these results may not reflect real trading performance, and Collective2 does comply with these disclosure rules. However, the lack of independent auditing makes it difficult for potential subscribers to fully trust the results without a layer of third-party oversight.

In short, while the results are disclosed, the absence of independent auditing means that, theoretically, there’s a risk that the results could be fabricated or manipulated, and users should approach with caution, particularly when dealing with systems that boast exceptional performance. Conducting your own due diligence and asking for real-world results or feedback from other users can help mitigate this risk.

 

[arturo100]

be informed this business is full of people like destriero no one is legit without auditing.

Collective2 trading systems are not audited by third-party independent auditors. Collective2 provides a platform for developers to publish and share their trading strategies, and while it tracks the performance of these strategies, the results shown are typically hypothetical and not verified by external, independent auditors.

Collective2 does disclose real trading results from users who mirror trading systems, the lack of third-party auditing means that there's no independent verification of these results. This absence of independent auditing leaves the platform open to skepticism, as there’s no guarantee that the results displayed are accurate or free from manipulation.

Collective2 tracks and reports the performance of trading strategies, including both hypothetical and real trading data. However, since there’s no third-party verification of these results, it’s possible that system developers could misrepresent performance, even though Collective2 emphasizes that they strive to provide accurate data. The platform relies on its internal tracking mechanisms, which may not be as robust as an external audit by an independent entity.

The CFTC requires platforms that present hypothetical trading results to make clear disclosures that these results may not reflect real trading performance, and Collective2 does comply with these disclosure rules. However, the lack of independent auditing makes it difficult for potential subscribers to fully trust the results without a layer of third-party oversight.

In short, while the results are disclosed, the absence of independent auditing means that, theoretically, there’s a risk that the results could be fabricated or manipulated, and users should approach with caution, particularly when dealing with systems that boast exceptional performance. Conducting your own due diligence and asking for real-world results or feedback from other users can help mitigate this risk.

Allright, but still his trades remain more documented than those of 99% people here on the Elite Trader forum.

 

[MarkBrown]

Allright, but still his trades remain more documented than those of 99% people here on the Elite Trader forum.

how so documented? what is documented? audited no right!

i seen this same shit on this forum for decades with other megalomaniacs some of who are dead now like Jack Hershey.

in the end delirious is just another fake ass trader guru.

 

[arturo100]

how so documented? what is documented? audited no right!

Much more documented than what you wrote a few posts back when you were asked to show proof of richness of your idol:
"Not all billionaires are reported or publicly listed. Many ultra-wealthy individuals choose to keep a low profile for several reasons, including privacy concerns, security risks, and a desire to avoid public scrutiny."

 

[MarkBrown]

Much more documented than what you wrote a few posts back when you were asked to show proof of richness of your idol:
"Not all billionaires are reported or publicly listed. Many ultra-wealthy individuals choose to keep a low profile for several reasons, including privacy concerns, security risks, and a desire to avoid public scrutiny."

consider this i have never said anything bad about anyone on et until provoked.

unlike you des/poo/arturo and so on - who goes after anyone and everyone who doesn't suck his dick.

 

[arturo100]

consider this i have never said anything bad about anyone on et until provoked. unlike you des/poo/arturo and so on - who goes after anyone and everyone who doesn't suck his dick.

And who would I have spoken badly about? Let's hear it.