Shooting Near Texas A&M

Quote from futurecurrents:

Keep all the guns you want I say.

As long as they're not hand-guns, assault weapons or have, or can take, large magazines - say more than five shells.

What would be so terrible about that? Seems fairly reasonable to me.
Ooh yes those evil handguns.
Do you even know what an "assault weapon" is?
Why not 4 or 3 or 2 rounds?

So I can walk into a theater with 4 rifles loaded with 5 rounds each and kill 20 people and you're OK with that? But one rifle with 20 rounds and you have a problem with it?

You're just another ignorant anti gun loon who doesn't have a clue as to what you're talking about.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

So I can walk into a theater with 4 rifles loaded with 5 rounds each and kill 20 people and you're OK with that? But one rifle with 20 rounds and you have a problem with it?

Well, if I had the choice, I would probably prefer to be confronted with your 4 rifles instead of one. I could slap you a lot more while you're busy to fumble all 4 rifles out of your coat. :)
 
Quote from jcl:

Well, if I had the choice, I would probably prefer to be confronted with your 4 rifles instead of one. I could slap you a lot more while you're busy to fumble all 4 rifles out of your coat. :)
I was thinking more like one on each shoulder and one in each hand.

How good at slapping like a girl are you with a bullet in your head?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

I was thinking more like one on each shoulder and one in each hand.

How good at slapping like a girl are you with a bullet in your head?
I'm just trying to imagine you walking with 4 rifles on your shoulders and hands in a theater. Unless you were born with 4 arms, you'd need some mechanical arms like Robocop for handling your gun arsenal. :)

A bullet is probably not required, people would already die of laughing at your appearance.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

So in other words, yet again, you got nothing.
No. Just pointing out that BSAM got it right while providing some specificity on the nature of the box.
 
Quote from jcl:

Well, if I had the choice, I would probably prefer to be confronted with your 4 rifles instead of one. I could slap you a lot more while you're busy to fumble all 4 rifles out of your coat. :)

Don't think so. I'm a prior Marine. I promise you that you won't be slapping anyone when they're standing 5 meters away firing rounds at you.
 
Quote from LEAPup:

Don't think so. I'm a prior Marine. I promise you that you won't be slapping anyone when they're standing 5 meters away firing rounds at you.

OOOH prior Marine, scary.
 
Quote from LEAPup:

My Godfather, God rest his soul, used to walk to school as a kid with his Friends. In the fall, they used to carry .22 rifles and shotguns to school, put them in the corner of the Principal's office, then when school was out they would squirrel hunt as they walked home.

This was in the south east, and was in the early 1950's.

My question to all of the gun control people is simple. Have those guns kids left in the Principal's office changed any at all? Don't think so. A gun fires a projectile today just as it did back then...

The above is something the anti gun community just can't argue with. They know people have changed for the worse, and want to do ZERO about it besides taking away a piece of metal 99% everyday, law abiding people use for protection, hunting, and like me these days, punching holes in paper.
 
Quote from jcl:

I'm just trying to imagine you walking with 4 rifles on your shoulders and hands in a theater. Unless you were born with 4 arms, you'd need some mechanical arms like Robocop for handling your gun arsenal. :)

A bullet is probably not required, people would already die of laughing at your appearance.

Shows how completely ignorant you are of operating firearms.
 
Back
Top