Shooting in Paris

If one of these Syrian refuges that just arrived commit a terrorist act, Obama better be tried for treason. Obama would be directly responsible for bringing enemy combatants to US soil.
 
You started the name calling, doofus.

Now, have you grown a brain yet? If so, what should I DO about the Muslims that work for me, fire them because they're "all evil"?

Learn to read, dumb POS. I wrote Islam is pure evil. Never did I wrote anywhere all muslims are evil. Let me spell it out for you. The religion of Islam causes a minority of extreme Muslims to commit crimes, like in Paris this weekend. The majority of Muslims approves of this and there's another part of Muslims, that are somewhat "enlightened", that have adapted modern values. Can you get that through your thick skull? As far as you and your imaginary muslim employees are concerned, I don't give a shit, go bankrupt, kill yourselves, go rot in hell, whatever.
 
Last edited:
If one of these Syrian refuges that just arrived commit a terrorist act, Obama better be tried for treason. Obama would be directly responsible for bringing enemy combatants to US soil.
Nice fantasy. In mine, Bush II gets that.
 
Well then it's more complicated than you'll be ever be able to comprehend, mthrfckr.

Ran out of arguments, and immediately there's the insults and namecalling.
And you want us to believe you run a company? ROFLMAO!

You're nothing but an useless jerk like your banned buddy DB.
 
I'm not in favor of putting troops in syria or anywhere else. The evidence is we do as much harm as good. But why in the world would we want to invite them into our own country? Even if one percent of them are secret terrorists or, as has happened, later become radicalized, they can cause enormous damage. Why risk it?
 
when you rule out all logical reasons... there are only a few possible motives for this penchant the left has to risk terror and destruction.

I'm not in favor of putting troops in syria or anywhere else. The evidence is we do as much harm as good. But why in the world would we want to invite them into our own country? Even if one percent of them are secret terrorists or, as has happened, later become radicalized, they can cause enormous damage. Why risk it?
 
Hollande calls this an act of war by Isis. He left out a most important fact: some of the terrorists
were French nationals known to French security forces. France has a malignancy within itself and Hollande will step up the bombing campaign in Iraq and Syria. That's like treating an E Coli patient by killing a cow. France, nay Europe, must root out every single Islamic radical in its lands and give no quarter to those who would abet Islamic terrorists. But they won't. Germany will still import 1/2 million Middle East refugees to address a labor shortage and worry later about the Islamist scourge that will come along with them. It is a cynical cost benefit analysis.
 
Last edited:
It's not a lot different than obama's determination to let people exposed to ebola come here. Liberals are always ready to sacrifice other people so they can posture as morally superior.


There was NOT a policy to allow those exposed to ebola to come here. The policy was not to shut down flights from Africa and to monitor those returning from affected areas. His decision was sound and correct as I think only one person developed ebola after returning from Africa ( the Dr. in NYC) and he did not generate any new ebola cases.

I know, I know, guys, you wish the dr. had spread the virus to his NYC neighbors.
 
Back
Top