Quote from Lucrum:
Correct me if I'm wrong. The premise behind mandatory auto insurance is that my driving can cause damage to other motorists while unavoidably driving in close proximity to each other.
My getting sick doesn't necessarily have to affect anyone else. I can pay my own insurance premiums and then the insurance pays, I can pay for my own medical expenses directly without insurance. Or I can stay home and employ natural/home remedies or even just crawl into bed and die.
Now granted, if I elect not to have medical insurance. But go to the hospital and run up bills I can't or won't pay. THEN it certainly effects others financially as the costs get passed on to those who do pay. But it doesn't have to be that way. I say, if someone elects not to have insurance, they either pay their medical bills or don't go the the doctor. The problem is our pussified bleeding hearts refuse to allow people to be responsible for their own decisions. Such as the "right to Choose" as to insure oneself or not.
What is being said here about medical insurance is that medical bills are so high that individuals cannot possibly pay them out of their personal finances so the risk must be distributed across the population which, of course, means to those who are not utilizing medical services meaning that the left thinks young healthy people should pay for the medical care of old sick people. It is that simple.
All I'm saying is that I am going to pay for my own medical bills. If that means that I will die penniless I am reasonably sure I won't care because...well, I'll be dead.

I'll set my family up with life insurance so I wouldn't be leaving anyone behind broke. How long until the government mandates that young healthy people pay death benefits to those who, uhm..die?
