Sheer madness on the left.

How many ways can we be offended today is the new challenge. Surpirsing they weren't offended that this appears to be a straight white couple. Should have had a couple of interracial trannys, one being a one legged midget.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/hotel-fo...ouple-enjoying-breakfast-bed-2-085623770.html
A seemingly innocent advertisement of a young couple enjoying their breakfast in bed has seen a hotel accused of gender stereotyping.

Lounging out in their bathrobes with a selection of croissants, fruit salad and other baked goods on display, the couple stare lovingly into one another’s eyes – but it’s their reading material that has social media users up in arms.

A closer look reveals the woman is half way through a Chanel coffee table book, while the man is catching up on the Financial Review.

Elizabeth Redman, a reporter at The Australian, called out the Brisbane hotel on Twitter, writing “your breakfast looks delicious… just wanted to let you know I’m a woman and I also read the Financial Review every day”.

“Of course, the fruit platter is on her side, she’d be loathed to touch the baked goods,” another wrote.

just remember, the faster this stuff moves along, the more it will blow up in their faces. When everyone is offended about everything, no one can claim offense.

Eventually, it all comes crashing down.
 
Leftists had epic meltdowns:

meltdown - Copy.png


And the Gaslight Gazette tells us not to believe our lying eyes :D

wapo - Copy.png
 
This is the problem with lefties right here. How do you argue with ignorance pretending to be superior... when they are not wiling to learn basic scientific fact.

There is no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes net warming. We have a very complex environment with negative feedbacks. The recent studies show that clouds and water vapor feedbacks probably far outweigh anything man made co2 could do.
Plus Ocean temps lead co2 levels up and down. So the science is far from settled. Even the rhetoric is bullshit as the 97 percent idea was cherry picked. 97 scientists of a survey of 10,000 started off the b.s.

But... lefties argue as if its wrong to question their beliefs.

2. Jesus was crucified by powerful remote Federal type govt.
I doubt he would be in favor of big govt socialism. Not the way it is being implemented by the cronies in power. He would probably be in favor of local government and big charity from the citizens.


{QUOTE="kingjelly, post: 4741602, member: 95641"]They are fighting harder, but you have to understand what they are fighting for. They are fighting for their children. I think the biggest problem with the right is the short term thinking. They are willing to sacrifice tomorrow for today. 'It's fine if my grandchild gets lung cancer from burning coal as long the coal miner has a job today. It's fine to not believe the settled science of man made global warming and let my children suffer as long as we are creating pipelines today. It's fine to try to deny birth control and abortions because there is a old myth about a fella named jesus that doesn't make a lot of sense but it was passed down to me so it must be true, and I don't understand the exponential function anyway so why not have as many people on earth as possible (long as they are christians...)'.

It's not all socialism (which by the way is exactly what jesus would vote for). You are killing the younger generations with your incessant focus on today. Ask yourself this question, and be truthful to yourself, if forced into a 'Sohpie's Choice' would Trump choose the country doing well or himself doing well, it could only be one. There are many men who would and do give their lives for this country, if you actually believe he has that kind of self sacrifice in him, then you truly are lost.

Lord forgive them, they know not what they do to our children[/QUOTE]
 
I doubt he would be in favor of big govt socialism. Not the way it is being implemented by the cronies in power. He would probably be in favor of local government and big charity from the citizens.

He would. The whole idea of "you reap what you sow" and "sloth" goes against getting stuff for not having worked for it.
 
But, he also advocating helping others who need help.

Many of Jesus teachings are hard to reconcile until you realize the point of his ministry.



He would. The whole idea of "you reap what you sow" and "sloth" goes against getting stuff for not having worked for it.
 
But, he also taught about helping others as well.
But, many of Jesus teachings are hard to accept until you realize he was preaching that we should strive to be as good as we can be, but as we fall short we need God's grace.

Not "when" but "as". None of us will ever be good enough to balance the scales.
 
Back
Top