Sharpen Your Moving Averages

[panzerman]

Here is a simple trick from the world of digital signals processing to improve the filtering performance of your MAs.

1. Filter the input signal, x(n) i.e. price, once with your moving average
2. Double the moving average value to obtain w(n)
3. Subtract w(n) from 3*x(n) to obtain u(n)
4. Filter u(n) twice with your moving average to obtain your output y(n)

You are welcome.

 

[tony.m]

Here is a simple trick from the world of digital signals processing to improve the filtering performance of your MAs.

1. Filter the input signal, x(n) i.e. price, once with your moving average
2. Double the moving average value to obtain w(n)
3. Subtract w(n) from 3*x(n) to obtain u(n)
4. Filter u(n) twice with your moving average to obtain your output y(n)

Sounds like you’re ready to start selling courses and indicators.

 

[panzerman]

Sounds like you’re ready to start selling courses and indicators.

No, I just want to help folks.

For my next tip, to get zero lag or even negative lag, research forward-backward filtering using emas (ie one-pole infinite impulse response filters.) You will get outstanding filtering performance, which can be improved even further by sharpening your reverse ema.

 

[MarkBrown]

first order filter ?

 

[panzerman]

first order filter ?

Yes. You can certainly use more poles in your filter design, but in reverse filtering situations, you will need to estimate more days into the future with higher order IIRs, which introduces more chances for errors in the output.

 

[schizo]

No, I just want to help folks.

For my next tip, to get zero lag or even negative lag, research forward-backward filtering using emas (ie one-pole infinite impulse response filters.) You will get outstanding filtering performance, which can be improved even further by sharpening your reverse ema.

Only way to tell is to actually see a chart with your ema next to the regular ema. Can you whip up a chart with those indicators and post it so we can see the comparison?

 

[themickey]

Here is a simple trick from the world of digital signals processing to improve the filtering performance of your MAs.

1. Filter the input signal, x(n) i.e. price, once with your moving average
2. Double the moving average value to obtain w(n)
3. Subtract w(n) from 3*x(n) to obtain u(n)
4. Filter u(n) twice with your moving average to obtain your output y(n)

You are welcome.

If you have a pile of dogshit and mix in with it more and different dogshit, with that you can't bake a cake, doesn't matter what sort of dogshit recipe formula you use.

 

[Zwaen]

The goal of using a ma is often to see a trend, or let's call it dominant movement of a time series. Perhaps also eyeballing momentum.

How does this add value to this goal?

 

[tony.m]

If you have a pile of dogshit and mix in with it more and different dogshit, with that you can't bake a cake, doesn't matter what sort of dogshit recipe formula you use.

It would have been different if it was cow shit.

 

[Real Money]

Only way to tell is to actually see a chart with your ema next to the regular ema. Can you whip up a chart with those indicators and post it so we can see the comparison?

thinkScript code implementation

plot Xn = close;
plot EMA = ExpAverage(Xn,20);
plot Wn =  2 * EMA;
plot Un = 3 * Xn - Wn;
plot EMA1 = ExpAverage(Un,20);
plot EMA2 = ExpAverage(EMA1,20);