sharpe ratio

33% losing years, and Sharpe of 2.5, something doesn't seem right.

the losing year is very small. that is why 33% losing years still have 2.5 sharpe. This strategy lost in 5 bull years, but a small loss. as below:

year stat:200300 net gain:-4037.7
year stat:200400 net gain:36832.4
year stat:200500 net gain:-5290.0
year stat:200600 net gain:-2185
year stat:200700 net gain:38319.8
year stat:200800 net gain:48684.3
year stat:200900 net gain:91822.8
year stat:201000 net gain:-24124.
year stat:201100 net gain:168564
year stat:201200 net gain:-40061.
year stat:201300 net gain:20314.9
year stat:201400 net gain:56301.5
year stat:201500 net gain:54321
year stat:201600 net gain:77223.8
year stat:201700 net gain:3754.74
year stat:201800 net gain:144918
year stat:201900 net gain:45620
year stat:202000 net gain:200510
year stat:202100 net gain:54295.4
year stat:202200 net gain:153242
 
33% losing years, and sharpe of 2.5, something doesn't feel right.

Yeah, those years could have had small losses I suppose. Or, could be a over-fitted backtest. Over-fitting will show huge numbers. It's just one of many metrics and if your account isn't exceptionally large I don't think 2.5 is unreasonable.

Of course the best metric is with a decent sized account using real money. Even then, I think things are more fragile than we like to believe and so I wouldn't harbor expectations. The chance of getting hit by a bus, no matter how small, is still there. That's just life.
 
the losing year is very small. that is why 33% losing years still have 2.5 sharpe. This strategy lost in 5 bull years, but a small loss. as below:

year stat:200300 net gain:-4037.7
year stat:200400 net gain:36832.4
year stat:200500 net gain:-5290.0
year stat:200600 net gain:-2185
year stat:200700 net gain:38319.8
year stat:200800 net gain:48684.3
year stat:200900 net gain:91822.8
year stat:201000 net gain:-24124.
year stat:201100 net gain:168564
year stat:201200 net gain:-40061.
year stat:201300 net gain:20314.9
year stat:201400 net gain:56301.5
year stat:201500 net gain:54321
year stat:201600 net gain:77223.8
year stat:201700 net gain:3754.74
year stat:201800 net gain:144918
year stat:201900 net gain:45620
year stat:202000 net gain:200510
year stat:202100 net gain:54295.4
year stat:202200 net gain:153242

That is not sharpe of 2.5.

I am seeing average 0.85 sharpe, average about 55000 stdev about 66000
 
  • Like
Reactions: spy
That is not sharpe of 2.5.

I am seeing average 0.85 sharpe, average about 55000 stdev about 66000
I calculated sharpe based on daily return of the last 20 years, then annualized it, that gives me 2.5.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, those years could have had small losses I suppose. Or, could be a over-fitted backtest. Over-fitting will show huge numbers. It's just one of many metrics and if your account isn't exceptionally large I don't think 2.5 is unreasonable.

Of course the best metric is with a decent sized account using real money. Even then, I think things are more fragile than we like to believe and so I wouldn't harbor expectations. The chance of getting hit by a bus, no matter how small, is still there. That's just life.


I only have 1-2 parameters, with 200k trades. That is not curve fitting
 
I only have 1-2 parameters, with 200k trades. That is not curve fitting

No need to be defensive. I didn't accuse you of anything, just commenting on possibilities. How am I supposed to know what you did, or didn't, do?
 
Back
Top