Why am I not surprised you have those photos?
I think you need to look in the mirror, and then....therapy.
I think you need to look in the mirror, and then....therapy.
Quote from drmarkan:
Does it make a difference if the Jews in the Middle East came from Europe or are Maghrebi, Berber, Persian Jews, etc.? Or is a Jew a Jew to Palestinians? I think if you answer this question to yourself, you'll get the answer to your own.
Quote from TrueRange:
The rags would be in for a world of hurt if they tried to enforce that medieval crap here. Americans do not like to be told what religion they are to follow.
And the blood of the pig fearing would flow like wine in the streets.
Quote from spect8or:
No, it would certainly not be fine.
Just look at the world Wael. Places where you find the most religious difference, racial difference, linguistic difference, cultural difference are precisely the places where you find the most trouble, hatred and warfare. Quite clearly, introducing such differences into our societies does not benefit us at all. The idea that diversity is a "strength" is a monstrous lie.
Georgians are not Muslims, for a start.
To answer your question, OBVIOUSLY if they are white then at least they aren't going to be a cause of RACIAL division. That's just one less problem we have to conted with.
Secondly, Albanian and Bosnian Muslims are better behaved than Arab, African and Asian Muslims by orders of magnitude. With all the yapping done about "moderate Islam", it's a wonder I have yet to see anyone suggest Albania or Bosnia as examples. These are the mos lax Muslims you will find anywhere. In fact, an American travelling in Sarajevo might be surprised to hear that it's a Muslim city, since the "Muslims" there are so un-Islamic they could be mistaken for western liberals.
Nevertheless, their Islamic religion prevents them from interbreeding with non-Muslims, so even though they are racially far more compatible with other Euroepans, they will continue to maintain a distinct identity, which again leads to permanent divisions. (And divisions, I repeat, are not good.)
Therefore, the easiest answer is to simply end immigration. There is VERY little economic justification for it, and there is certainly no cultural or social benefit from it, so then why the hell do we need it? Hell, if *I*, as an immigrant myself, can admit the lunacy of the whole project, why can't native born westerners themselves see it? And if I'm not concerned about speaking the truth, why are they? [/B]
Quote from LondonUSTrader:
The answer to your question is yes we would and do mind about immigrants whether they be from Eastern Europe or Muslim countries.
Race is not an issue here unless you are overtly racist. The bigger issue, for me, anyway is what the immigrants actually contribute to the country. In my view, they take a lot and contribute very little. There are a few issues in this regard:
(1) By increasing the labour supply immigrant workers decrease wages for the average Briton. Thus the average wages for occupations dominated by immigrants tends to be lower than it would be without them.
(2) There are also less benefits to the local economy from an immigrant being employed than a local. The reason for this is a significant proportion of an immigrant's wage is not spent locally, but repatriated abroad to their country of destination.
(3) If you take the average immigrant they are more reliant on government benefits. My observation is that immigrants also tend to have greater likelihood of being involved in organised crime than the average local.
(4) Immigrants tend to be rather insular. Immigrants inhabit certain areas and mostly adopt a policy of isolation from the locals. Thus, 40% of all immigrants to the UK go to London. The problem isn't them keeping up their own culture. It is they fact they don't assimilate to the local culture.
(5) Because of typical government incompetence most areas simply don't have the infrastrucuture to deal with the constant flow of immigrants. Public transport in London is a typical example of this.
I am not against immigrants per se. I am against them if they don't contribute to society, which seems to be clearly the case in Britain presently.
Hmm, maybe that part about moving back HOME is the reason why she actually IS different. Maybe having being raised and having lived all her life in Canada her home should be in Canada and going back home should mean going back to Canada, not to Gaza?Quote from WAEL012000:
By the way, you know why my Christian Palestinian wife, a university TA who was raised in Canada, wanted to move backhome?
She was always reminded that she was VERY different.
Quote from WAEL012000:
Oh please buddy! do not let me stop you. there must be a deeper root to your problem. could it be smaller dick??
Loved your poetic description though.