praetorian: âI think i'm decent, not good, definately not great, Im up almost 200% with a bit over 2 months to go.â
Iâd say youâre a lot better than âdecentâ if youâre up 200% on sizeable starting capital and you continue to do that year after year.
âIf I were given 25k, I would have dumped most of it into something like gx and have been half way there.â
If this is the way that you normally trade then I donât find it surprising that you can pull in some big numbers. I just hope that newer undercapitalized traders donât follow your example of what constitutes acceptable risk and diversification.
When someone throws out a big number and you follow it with up with a âit's not that hardâ, I think youâre just setting a lot of the newer guys up for unrealistic expectations.
As Magna said: ââ¦is it possible, yes, is it hard, a resounding YES.â
You may personally find that âitâs not that hardâ, but Iâm afraid that, judging by the percentage of new traders that fail and the percentage of professionals that fall far short of hitting that mark year after year, the numbers just arenât with you on this one.
âI know someone who used to make a few hundred % annually trading a multimillion dollar accountâ¦â
IMHO, It should be irrelevant to a newer trader what the best trader or traders are pulling down. If a newer trader deals with the basics, the rest will fall into place. Itâs not as if we replaced the âitâs a frigginâ breeze to make 200-400%â with âyou can make some really good money if you know what youâre doingâ, that weâd be at risk of setting the bar too low for prospective traders. In fact, it might help new traders to shift the focus onto appropriate risk control so that they can survive long enough to learn the game and have a decent chance to achieve their dream of shooting for the stars.