Seth Klarman, author of "Margin of Safety" loses $645m on PG&E

The book is worth a read, and is a good basis for value based approach, which should be part of scenario when deals are abound such as 2008/2015 areas. There were pickins that made people extreme returns.
 
Fortune favors the bold.

Based on the numbers posted here that is a small trade given his worth. 2% of his worth on one trade.
%%
2% is a lot on a co with PCG management........WSJ noted, again they have been thru chapter 11 back when bankruptcy lawyers charged a lot less.

No disrespect intended. However even with bear bit , no dividend like PCG; they could have made money. In thier favor, it had a good dead cat/dead rat bounce from $17 to $27 area, late 2018.:cool::cool:
 
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hedge-fund-pge-losses-160917499.html

I'm sure everyone here has heard of his book. If you haven't, you can pick up a copy on Amazon for about $1,000.

It just goes to show you, that even if you're a great investor, you can still get your ass kicked in the market.
Thank you for introducing me to Klarman.

Quickly read his book. Learned a few things from reading the book. Thank you.
 
One thing I took note reading the book:

As part of his value investing philosophy, he advocated averaging down when buying. This seemed contradicting what most ET posters said: NEVER AVERAGE DOWN!!!

Any comments or words of wisdom?
 
One thing I took note reading the book:

As part of his value investing philosophy, he advocated averaging down when buying. This seemed contradicting what most ET posters said: NEVER AVERAGE DOWN!!!

Any comments or words of wisdom?
%%
Yes, like the Paul Tudor Jones post it note, noted ''LOSERS Average Losers''.Like lots of losers averaged down on GM, could have worked for while; then GM went bankrupt.Oops/ LOL . New GM is doing fine this year, as of yesterdays close.[But that did not help old GM shareholders @ all ; but they may have gotten a small dividend??]Of course when you get paid on AUM,[regardless of profit] big difference.

But a well researched battle plan averaging up, or average down plan [ well researched plan] could work real well, say if you did that off 200 or 220dma, with exit plan ...........................So something that looks the same same ,is actually the difference in daylight + dark.:cool::cool:
 
But a well researched battle plan averaging up, or average down plan [ well researched plan] could work real well, say if you did that off 200 or 220dma, with exit plan ...........................So something that looks the same same ,is actually the difference in daylight + dark.:cool::cool:
Yes, my well researched battle plan on GE started at ~$25 and kept average down. Hope it is a GE and not a GM.
 
One thing I took note reading the book:

As part of his value investing philosophy, he advocated averaging down when buying. This seemed contradicting what most ET posters said: NEVER AVERAGE DOWN!!!

Any comments or words of wisdom?

Value guys average down. Momentum guys average up.

Value guys are contrarians and so they see better and better upside as their position moves against them.
 
Yes, my well researched battle plan on GE started at ~$25 and kept average down. Hope it is a GE and not a GM.
%%
The founder of Investors Business Daily, said [while he was still running it] ''i don't know why people buy ETFs- i can make more money buying stocks '' ??[small caps + large caps] Unquote.Well he was unusually good/skilled + that is how he bought a NYSE seat, out of his stock profits ,as a young man.................................

I know why some buy good ETFs, not just because one can make money with drawdowns, even though that can happen. Some sell + buy ETFs because they lose less money+ make more money, than with stocks.:cool::cool:.NOT a prediction.
 
Back
Top