September debate/tonight

[UsualName]

It should make for great viewing, specially after the debate, when they try to validate their insanity in the spin room.

I am reading Yang has an attack planned on someone that is not Joe Biden but he said the same thing last debate about Bennett and nothing happened.

Kamala has to start throwing some blows at people who are not Joe Biden too. They draw from the same donors and supporters and if she comes in flat tonight she may as well pack it up because the left/left don’t love her.

There is a view out there that I subscribe to, and it is that Warren is playing the long game so will not be getting into any dirty character stuff or hit and run character assassination because she wants to not only beat Biden, but also have him swing over and support her in the end, even during the primary season at the very end.

So she would be seeking an opportunity to get ballsy and alpha with Joe but just around the issues- not about being two-faced and an idiot and on the decline. Her preferred avenue is to draw Joe into their historical area of baggage and conflict and head-butting which consumer finance, bankruptcy, and related. So if she can draw him into that area she can get to look smart and knowledgeable and in charge without smacking Joe's character.

And the numbers are incrementing in her favor so she does not need to cut his balls off - yet. She will deal with that when and if things are no longer working for her. No if she could make it all the way to end without talking about- eg.- Ukraine type things that would work best for her. Thats what the other clowns are there for. To take care of bidness for her.

Biden is out there alone a bit now, contrary to his previous days when the dnc-approved players were there for him. Obama pretends that he is neutral but has not helped him and Axlerod, Van Jones, and several other Obamadroids are taking shots at Biden which they would not do if they thought it would be them on the wrong side of Obama. And Hillary similarly argues that she is neutral- all while meeting more and more with Warren to strategize.

The problem that Warren will have in drawing him into her issues, is that the dud moderators are not interested in her finance issues so will not/probably not ask questions to give her an opening. You know Jorge Ramos will want to do three hours of children, cages, "manufactured crises" and existential threat shit. You can close your eyes and see it all now.

Warren is playing the doe eyed, golly gosh who me role but we aren’t the only ones to notice she has peeled support from other candidates. Those candidates have noticed too.

Ed Rendell is our calling Warren a hypocrite right now. It’s all rolling down the street.

In my mind Warren better keep her head on a swivel. She is the most vulnerable up there and her support is not rock solid.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Ed Rendell is our calling Warren a hypocrite right now. It’s all rolling down the street.

.

Yeh, that Rendell thing is dicey.

Rendell, of course, is supporting Joe. But Rendell is also Mr. Pennsylvania. So if/when Biden goes down and Warren is trying to take PA - one of the most critical swing states- he just stuck a hot poke up her arse. Yeh sure, people walk a lot of stuff back and get kissy-faced down the road, but the voters do not always do that. If you like Joe and did not really warm up to Warren, the Rendell just sent a signal that she is two-faced. Not major but in elections that pivot on a handful of votes, it does not help.

 

[Cuddles]

Is this a metaphor ..

We used to call that racism in my day

 

[vanzandt]

Corey who?

Edit: Hey that Castro dude... he's the most intolerable one out there. God he's annoying.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Snopes Issues Pre-Approval Of All Statements Made During Tonight's Democratic Debate
July 30th, 2019

213.8kSHARE
28.7kSHARE
SHARE
U.S.—With the Democratic primary debates in full swing, many fact-checking websites are preparing to review candidates’ statements for accuracy. Thankfully, Snopes, the most unbiased fact-checking website ever, has found a way to expedite their evaluation process.

Since their original founding in 1957 by the KGB, Snopes has gained a reputation for objectively reporting what someone’s secret motivations probably were, and what they probably really meant when they said something. More recently, they have perfected the art of determining whether a satirical article is hilarious, left-leaning comedy or divisive, conservative-leaning fake news.

As part of their ongoing goal of being able to rush to judgment as quickly as possible, Snopes published a pre-approval of all future statements made by candidates during the Democratic debates.

“While we understand there may be some disagreements among progressive candidates on certain issues, we know that nobody who shares our worldview would ever say anything factually untrue,” Snopes explains in their article.

Snopes also clarified that in the event a candidate does say anything that sounds untrue/conservative, they will automatically conclude that the individual had pure intentions and meant something completely different. As a very last resort, they may change a particular rating to “mixed,” assuming some context was missing.

At publishing time, Snopes had also released a fact-check for all future statements by President Trump, rating them all as “False.”
https://babylonbee.com/news/snopes-issues-pre-approval-on-all-statements-made-during-tonights-democratic-debate

 

[elderado]

Beto is a furry.

Do you think there will actually be hard questions asked?

 

[Hari Seldon]

It is hard out there in the suburbs sez Booker, Kamala practices her baby voice and joe chews on window pane.

 

[Hari Seldon]

Sorry, can't understand you. Please speak English, lmao.

 

[smallfil]

Buttitieg just swallowed Jorge Ramos assertion that Trump supporters are racist because they chanted "Build that wall" and "Send her back". He directly, said Trump supporters are racist! Just shows you how that tolerance, love and diversity thing is working out in the US! Democrats hate everyone else who disagrees with them and calls them racist. How many voters do they think they can flip because they call those people racist? On the plus side, President Donald Trump can save monies and just run a montage of these extreme liberals with their vile, filthy mouths spewing hate all over! That should finish them all in one fell swoop!

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

You know, after this debate, the old guys will take hits for stumbling and bumbling, but you know what? Kamala just always sounds punchdrunk as hell to me. I am pretty sure that Willie must have bonked her brains out.