Senator McCain did not put country first when he selected his running mate

Quote from Gringinho:

...Like you, many people read your bibles, and stop there...
You misunderstand again. I'm a scientist (PhD Physics, High Energy Theory) and also a religious man. The two go hand in hand.
 
Quote from Yannis:

You misunderstand again. I'm a scientist (PhD Physics, High Energy Theory) and also a religious man. The two go hand in hand.
...like a glove on a foot.
 
Quote from Yannis:

You misunderstand again. I'm a scientist (PhD Physics, High Energy Theory) and also a religious man. The two go hand in hand.

So...
what is your take on cold ionized gas state and the q c.d connection force to fluidity, is it super with very low viscose characteristics? How does energy distribute itself in that state, and is there an absolute point for solids wrt energy?

Mathematics span more than just the physical, as socioeconomics and other metrics show. Philosophical matters also lend themselves to strong reasoning.
:)
 
Quote from iceman1:

This will go down in history as the worst pick in presidential politics unless you equate running for the most powerful office in the world the same as casting an actress for a commercial film.

IF McBush wants a highly qualified candidate to stand next to him. One that is ready to lead this country should he need to step down due to medical issues then he failed miserably.

If he cares about himself, image and being elected at any cost and selected this charlatan cover girl in the the same or similar manner a director might employ an actress with box office potential only to increase revenue for a new film.... then he succeeded. The trouble with the latter scenario is that McBush is not casting a film and rather than putting Country First he demonstrated contempt for his fellow citizens!

The question that will be answered this election is whether the American dumbed-down electorate is discerning enough, despite labels like liberal or conservative, to see the biger picture and make the best decision out of two non-perfect choices.... and elect Obama/Biden after suffering through 8 years of a prior dumbed-down republican administration!!

It should be a no-brainer for any person with an IQ over 85.

If anyone can seriously deny what I have described they need to go sit in a corner and stare at a dark wall for a couple days until the delusion passes.


you're an idiot
 
Quote from Gringinho:

...Mathematics span more than just the physical, as socioeconomics and other metrics show. Philosophical matters also lend themselves to strong reasoning. :)
Here are some tidbits from my dissertation:

Did you know that at very high energies (momentum of particle >> rest mass) the probability of two particles colliding and then breaking up is equal to the probability that they spontaneously break up and then (their projected centers of mass) collide? In other words, at high energies (our best means to study the very nature of this universe) causality breaks down and gives way to a deeper reality and set of laws that we understand very little at this point.

Did you know that the parts of such colliding particles (eg, quarks) interact in timespans of less than 10 raised to -50 power? But because those interactions are not dominated by the laws of causality, as stated above, we cannot speak of those elements of whatever aligns those collisions as "time"... Therefore, one is led to understand that time, and basic logic as we know it out here in the "very low energy universe", break down at those levels of magnification, in favor of aligning principles that we can't even fathom at this point...

We have just begun to scratch the surface of these fundamental laws of matter/energy/space/time/existence and the results are more surprising than one would have thought. And, speaking of that, what is thought and how does it travel? Is "intuition" totally out of the question or can it make sense to us? How about a "thoughton"? What principles lie underneath such basic concept as causality? Can you EVER get to the bottom of anything or is the heart of the universe and its laws just designed to be an endless loop, a "grand uncertainty principle" domain waiting for those of us who are arrogant enough to think that they can? etc etc.

That's one of the reasons why I said before that, as a good scientist, I'm a very religious man.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Funny but Ice is ALSO Jewish. You'll see the pattern here.
It continues to surprise me how you didn't succeed in your run for elected office. You're such a charmer, bringing people together and all that.

:p
 
Yannis,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_intelligence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_of_truth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_deduction

really?
Care to elaborate on your statement?
Don't you think there is any credible information in Wikipedia?
Can you reason about why you have this opinion?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_of_faith
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_manipulation


I work professionally and have so for years on artificial intelligence, knowledge representation etc
and have a little different view than you have...
I see Wikipedia as useful in education and more... I gather you only need your bible, spiritual leader, politician etc...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincible_ignorance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralistic_ignorance


Try
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
:p
 
Back
Top