Senate Republican staffer put on leave for accessing Democratic files

[AAAintheBeltway]

Quote from dgabriel:



It's called a remedy to address laws that the court found to be unconstitutional (in this case state constitution).

So theyhad a marriage law for 200 years and a state constitution for 250 years and suddenly 4 judges out of 7 discover that it's been unconstitutional all these years and no one knew. This decision is the biggest judicial joke since Roe v. Wade and anyone with any legal background knows it. It is judicial law-making, pure and simple, and yes, that is scary because you can alwys vote out a legislature that makes silly laws but you can't with 4 nutcase, powermad judges.

 

[alfonso]

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Apparently the Democrats will permit you to profess belief in a religion, provided they are satisfied you don't mean it or actually believe it.

Or provided the religion in question is Islam.

Then liberals really pull out all the stops. Read a paper lately (NY Times for example)? Tell me Islam isn't the only religion the media has any respect for.

At precisely the time when Islamism is the greatest ideological threat facing the western world, too. Wonderful.

 

[alfonso]

Quote from ARogueTrader:



Can you imagine living under his own personal interpretation of the constitution that he would have everyone adhere to?

Would it be like living under the personal "interpretations" of the constitution that liberal justices routinely engage in?

 

[alfonso]

Quote from bungrider:



I mean, shit, why should some redneck have a right that a homosexual doesn't??? What are we, the 3rd reich here?? Pink triangles for all the fags?

Newsflash bongrider: they already had the right to marry.

To marry a woman, that is. Afterall, that is precisely what marriage has always meant.

 

[ARogueTrader]

Quote from alfonso:




Would it be like living under the personal "interpretations" of the constitution that liberal justices routinely engage in?

No.