Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
Well, that raises another issue, which is that Libertarians have a tendency to embrace pie in the sky solutions that are just not going to happen. It's like when they asked Ron Paul at a debate what he would do with someone who showed up at the ER with a serious condition and no insurance or money. Toss them out on the curb to die is the principled answer, but that isn;t goign to happen. Depend on private charity sounds good, and it is the way we did it for a long time, but at some point that doesn't cut it either.
I fully agree that a prerequisite to open bordes or labor mobility is to dismantle the welfare state or at least make it inaccessible for illegal, but we are moving in the opposite direction. As I believe Milton Friedman said, you can't have open borders and a welfare state.
Get back to me on the border issue when you have fixed welfare, but I' not holding my breath.
The othr thing that annoys me is people, often Libertarians, talking about the border being "militarized", meaning I guess having some actual security there. They claim it prevents illegals from moving back nd forth freely, so they just stay here. Whatever the merits of that claim, it is totaly preposterous in a post-9/11 wworld to suggest we shouldn;t watch our borders carefully and do everythng possible to secure them.
Normally I find your arguments and commentary to be informed and rather well thought out. Not this time, however.
Why is it we are the only country in the world that should lock down it's borders? Why us? Look deeper into that reason and you will find the root of the issues surrounding security. Hint, it has to do with meddling all over the world.
As for pie in the sky ideas, when an idea is correct, you don't back off because it's hard to implement. The end to the welfare state will come eventually, either through legislative change or because we will eventually go broke. But it will happen. As I've said many times before, it's just a matter of math.