This statement alone, says you should not sell puts.I´m only interested in the premium not the stock.
I have noticed some sligthly OTM puts with a premium of $ 8.00 or above on some stocks which are priced around $49 and a strike of $48. Would it be a good idea of selling naked puts on them? If it drops below $48 you could be assigned but you might have a cushion till $40 ($48 (strike)-$8(premium)) before you suffer a loss, right?
Or do you prefer trading without leverage?.
FOOK NKLA!!!!!
Lets get in on Rivian!!!
I have noticed some sligthly OTM puts with a premium of $ 8.00 or above on some stocks which are priced around $49 and a strike of $48. Would it be a good idea of selling naked puts on them? If it drops below $48 you could be assigned but you might have a cushion till $40 ($48 (strike)-$8(premium)) before you suffer a loss, right?
I dislike the use of the term unlimited. It is usually used by people biased again short selling, being that there is no theoretical limit on the upside. In practice it is complete nonsense. As to selling puts there is an obvious downside limit. The stock can only go down to zero. Hence both in practice and theory the loss is limited.
It's not that much that it's "unlimited" as how much it eats into your net worth, when you're operating with considerable amounts of capital.
If your trading capital is $100 bucks then it don't matter. You can lose 100% of your "capital", who cares?
But your lifetime savings are like $200,000 and you place them all on selling naked puts and the stock value drops 50% overnight. You just lost HALF OF YOUR LIFE SAVINGS in a single blow.
That's where "unlimited" comes from.[/QUOTE