Originally posted by TickerWatcher
You got me!.....I made a mistake with the 100% markup, that's not too high.
By the way 300*.0025 = .75
The value we pay is in the commissions. Value is an opinion how we perceive the worth of something.
Traders can pay 1/2 cent and get value! To me value is a stable platform, good executions/quotes, new and leading edge tools, along with a good support group.
Paying more for slow executions and a mediocre platform and a training class would make me a foolish consumer, not to mention a terrible business manager.
Firms that can't cut the fat and/or develop new systems to become more competitive will fail! Evolution my man, survival of the fittest.
<i>In a couple of years clearing costs will be so inexpensive they will almost be nonexistent.</i>
This last part -- exactly. Just like it is for a pit trader.
I have no problem with people earning a profit. I've owned a business. And I couldn't begin to price my services/products without having a handle on costs. Now I'm a purchaser of services. I want to pay a fair price. And I don't want to pay for what I don't need. Clearing to me is not what it might be to 10 other traders. Sell me clearing at a fair price, according to the risk I present to you, so you can make money and I know how much I have to make to pay you for the service. But don't try to bundle a whole bunch of other crap with it and pump up the per-share rate -- I can pay for my own quotes, my own executions, my own front end, etc. -- and these things are a fixed expense to me (excepting executions). I can leverage my revenue against fixed expenses. I can't against a variable expense.
<b>Clearing is so bloody fungible it ought to be a fixed expense.</b>