The distinctions you make are trivialized on ET. I have been developing systems for 25 years, and even at Hedge funds we found that people that ran them would want to second guess certain system trades based on their own outlook, or start to second guess the system during drawdowns.Quote from Avalanche:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Lawrence Chan:
...Fully automated systems take out the human factor and avoid the emotional issues completely. ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is actually false but it is often said on ET.
A human is ultimately the one that turns a system on or off....
well duh, if they turn the system off sure, but that's the whole point he's trying to make. its "fully" automated. Turning it on and off would relegate it back to a greybox like senario and hence it wouldn't be what most people would term fully automated....
The point is that the human is very much in the mix in trading systems, inspite of all the people that tell you otherwise.
Even the most extreme scientists are afflicted by these problems. Pick up "The Predictors" sometime and read the section when they went live....
nitro


