If he is not fooled by randomness, he wouldn't be here, he would have attorneys, regulatory consultants, financial consultants advising him instead of asking us random retails.
There is a huge difference between being right, and the ability to proof you are right. It is very difficult to proof because you will never have access to the whole procedure that your orders go thru. And it will be very expensive too. The biggest part of the handling goes thru computer systems. The problem is that you have no idea what goes in the system, what goes out, and what happens in that computersystem. Can you give me in detail what happens with your orders? No, although that is the first thing you need. For that you need the source code of all software used in handling your orders. You will never get that.
If even the US cannot proof that Russia intervened in the last elections in the US, how can you then proof that brokers copy you? Or did NOT copy you? Electronic abuse can be very difficult to prove, especially if you use software that is provided by the potential cheater (your broker).
Do you know from each piece of software you install on your computer exactly, and completely what it does? No, you don't even have any clue about that.
Facebook and Google collect and (ab)use on a massive scale data from their customers, without them even knowing that.
Gaussian has the same opinion as you. He posted about abuses that happen on internet. It is about data that is much less interesting financially then copying high profitable trades. He is even worried about that happening. But cheating for big amounts of money would not happen? I would think just the opposite, they go for the big money. Have you never heard about insider trading? That is also forbidden and there are a lot of protective measure so that it would not happen. But it happens.
PS I do have brokers. What is the definition of a personal broker?
If somebody steals your car at night, you will see it next morning.
If somebody steals all the data from your PC, you will never know. And even if you would know, you would probablyt never be able to proof it happened, not to mention that finding who did it is even more complicated.