Quote from Fireplace:
Exactly, which is why what I found to work in 1998 still works just as good today, only thing that changes is volatility.
For some reason, this angers some people here.
Quote from Surprise:
@ the other side :
If u make money , u should think from whom exactly u r making money , check the table at the end of the doc please , and tell me where "clear repeated setups" fit ...

Quote from NoDoji:
I'm a skilled Technical trader who trades clear repeated setups several times a day. The traders who lose to me when trading the same time frame are Unskilled traders.
Here are several setups I traded Friday that I trade day after day with net positive results:
Ascending triangle breakout - Long entry above the fixed resistance shelf, following a move back up to previous resistance off lows. Target: break above the overnight high, fulfilled
With-trend HL (Pivot off higher low in an uptrend) - Long entry above a pullback bar's resistance level. Target: Break of previous pivot high, fulfilled.
Counter-trend RTM - Short entry off a 4th strong leg in an uptrend, wait for lower high to confirm. Target: pullback to, or break down thru, 20-bar moving average, fulfilled
TL support - Long entry off confirmed support at the trend line in a symmetrical triangle formation. Target: Symmetrical triangle breakout to a new daily high, fulfilled
Here's a site where you can study simple effective technical setups:
http://www.daytradingcoach.com/daytrading-technicalanalysis-course.htm
Great stuff.![]()
Quote from Surprise:
@ the other side :
If u make money , u should think from whom exactly u r making money
watch for traffic before crossing the street,very seldom will there be an oncoming bus at a trendlineQuote from Surprise:
Good for u
Now u profit from : Uninformed traders ( unskilled traders )
And you lose to : value motivated traders , Informed traders , Bluffers .
This what is meant by look who is on the other side , u can make money on these patterns but u have to look behind the patterns , filter your setups , make your strategy dynamic otherwise u will end by losing to traders mentioned above .
Quote from Surprise:
@ the other side :
If u make money , u should think from whom exactly u r making money , check the table at the end of the doc please , and tell me where "clear repeated setups" fit ...
http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~lharris/ACROBAT/Zerosum.pdf
Quote from Surprise:
Good for u
Now u profit from : Uninformed traders ( unskilled traders )
And you lose to : value motivated traders , Informed traders , Bluffers .
This what is meant by look who is on the other side , u can make money on these patterns but u have to look behind the patterns , filter your setups , make your strategy dynamic otherwise u will end by losing to traders mentioned above .
Quote from jack hershey:
I really do not think about who is opposite me except to say that I front run other traders using a parasitic approach which was modelled and developed in the years 1957 to 1960 I am told by those who stand on my shoulders.
My clear repeated "setup" keeps me in the market all the time and on the right side of the market. I do pool extraction profit segment by segment using one and only one patern's order of events.
Thus my category is parasitic trader and I have a scientific orientation.
You can confirm in the table that no one out trades me by any means whatsoever. Larry Harric is a very reliable researcher and ex admininstrator having lead the SEC. The SEC has tangled with me and they have apologied for the mistakes they made for citing me as an inside trader.
as pointed out to you you are stuck. You believe a collection of myths as stated in your OP. I empathize with you dilemma and that you cannot recieve input from those you must learn to repsect. Reread Larry's paper 10 or more times and grow up.
I promulgate one paradigm (PEP) and its applicatiions: PVT, SCT and SSR. It is based on principles and deductively proven.