Quote from Landis82:
I don't believe that these studies ( or at least some of the ones that I took a look at ) covered the effect of ETF's on the market.
And from a purely subjective point of you, I think that one could easily argue that the stock market has frequently had days where the market collapses triple digits into the close (ie. the last 7 minutes of trading) . . . which I would argue would not be the case if you were not allowed to simply "machine-gun" down the bids.
For me, it's really about slowing down the VELOCITY of the market.
Okay, so gunning the market higher into the close = OKAY!
Gunning the market lower into the close = BAD BAD BAD!
VELOCITY of the market up = GREAT!
VELOCITY of the market down = BAD BAD BAD!
Anyone wanting the uptick rule reinstated is misguided. Anyone who says that the uptick rule is responsible for the market's decline is conveniently denying reality. Shorting was deemed illegal for financial stocks and what happened to them? They got HAMMERED and they got HAMMERED QUICKLY WITH GREAT VELOCITY. Yep, the uptick rule would have helped out there!
If you advocate bringing back the uptick rule along with your pal Cramer, just know that you actually just want to take away an individual's freedom to transact the way they want to in the markets. Nothing more, nothing less. There will be no change in volatility, there will be no change in the ultimate outcome for many of these financial stocks, but boy I'm sure you'll be glad for giving away one of your financial rights!