I just confirmed with IB that they do not support sending spread orders to the floor.
BTW, I changed my strategy somewhat. Originally I wanted to follow the Weekly Spread Commentary (WSC) from MCRI as closely as possible but looking in more detail at their hypothetical past performance I am changing my strategy. I will exclude all energy spreads because when I look at their last year's performance that was the only class which suffered losses and I wonder if in today's geopolitical situation historical seasonal patterns are still relevant in this sector. I am also excluding all notes and bond spreads, I faintly remember when I read long ago about these spreads that they are rather sophisticated, need to be weighted and a simple 1:1 ratio based on seasonal patterns seems too simplistic.
Last year the WSC had a drawdown of about $13,000 and the Monthly portfolio of about $18,000 but when you look at the 17 year equity curve the Weekly once had a drawdown of about $20,000 and the Monthly of about $50,000, not that this is extraordinary but one has to be aware of the risks. BTW, I asked them what they suggest as their minimum capital to trade each portfolio as suggested and the answer came back: That depends.... - I can understand that they don't want to be pinned down to a number.
From now on I will overweight the low risk spreads like the agriculturals, especially calendar spreads.
BTW, I changed my strategy somewhat. Originally I wanted to follow the Weekly Spread Commentary (WSC) from MCRI as closely as possible but looking in more detail at their hypothetical past performance I am changing my strategy. I will exclude all energy spreads because when I look at their last year's performance that was the only class which suffered losses and I wonder if in today's geopolitical situation historical seasonal patterns are still relevant in this sector. I am also excluding all notes and bond spreads, I faintly remember when I read long ago about these spreads that they are rather sophisticated, need to be weighted and a simple 1:1 ratio based on seasonal patterns seems too simplistic.
Last year the WSC had a drawdown of about $13,000 and the Monthly portfolio of about $18,000 but when you look at the 17 year equity curve the Weekly once had a drawdown of about $20,000 and the Monthly of about $50,000, not that this is extraordinary but one has to be aware of the risks. BTW, I asked them what they suggest as their minimum capital to trade each portfolio as suggested and the answer came back: That depends.... - I can understand that they don't want to be pinned down to a number.
From now on I will overweight the low risk spreads like the agriculturals, especially calendar spreads.