Your thesis is wrong, dude. He lost the popular vote by 3,000,000. He won WI by less than 25K votes. Obviously zero intellectual rigor at you San Diego Upstairs College of Real Estate and Cosmetology.
Jem, I gotta run. My iPad is jut about dead and I need to focus on my Starbucks order. There is a black dude sitting here at a table without any coffee, so I gotta be on alert.
You spent two hours arguing a “jump party” thesis to debate a POST ELECTION poll posted by Tsing.
Above is a map just highlighting the counties that switched choices outright in 2016 versus 2012. Vast swaths of the population in the upper Midwest had a change of heart — and a change of parties.
Some of those counties flipped by more than 30 points. Consider Fayette County in Northwest Iowa, which flipped by 32 points. In 2012, Obama beat Romney by 12 points (55.3 - 43.3), but this year, Trump won the same county by almost 20 (56.4 - 37.0)
Michigan was widely regarded as a win for Clinton until just days before the election. But white, blue-collar workers turned out and helped deliver the state for Trump. Just over half of voters in Eaton, Michigan, in the middle of the state, carried Obama to victory there in 2012. On Tuesday, 50 percent went for Trump, flipping the county by 9 points.
Note: A small number of counties in the graphic above were colored incorrectly due to an error in the underlying data and have been corrected. The text has also been updated to reflect those changes.
You can show results county by county all that you would like. Your tenet is that educated voters jumped parties and you are cherry-picking county by county returns as proof. Lots of dumbshits switched party and voted for Trump. AGREED.
The poll addresses the voter ed demo...
The biz insider poll is post-election.
HRC won by a unprecedented 3MM votes.
So either show me the evidence that 3MM undocs voted for Hills or change the header on the biz insider poll.