That seems to be the case, Yes.
Sean Hannity is a client of Michael Cohen. Discuss.
- Thread starter destriero
- Start date
And the most correlated demographic trait among Clinton voters was illegal entry into the country.
First, I'm more Libertarian. Second, Bernie would never have been able to pass any socialist agenda with a republican congress. What he would have done is gone after corruption on Wall Street, in the DoJ, in Washington. He was an outsider, like Trump, but without the Cray Cray and big mouth.
lol then we're going to have to start seeing those deportations. The only actual voter-fraud was on the GOP side.
https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/debunking-voter-fraud-myth
Just being facetious. Saying rednecks in trailers voted for Trump is just as silly as saying broke-ass, inner city welfare minorities voted Clinton. Of course they did. In other news, Dog Bites Man.
My sarcasm filter went autistic.
But really, 69% of WV. 58% in MS. The poorest and more federally-dependent states voted overwhelmingly for Trump. Have you ever BEEN to WV?
Unfortunately, yes.
But what does that say? Trump may have overwhelming support from the poorest states, but he didn't suffer with the middle class or even the rich. Clinton had more voters from the highest income bracket, but not all that much more. There were plenty of well off and rich individuals who voted Trump. That's all I'm saying.
I'm not disputing that at all. There are a number of hypothesis I can draw from that, but simply saying "all stupid people voted for Trump" is disingenuous and merely projecting anger because they didn't vote the way democrats might have wanted. Instead, focus on the reasons they voted they way they did and address those within the democratic party (if possible) to get those voters to switch back. Some never will. But a percentage had voted democrat before. You said yourself they want to keep their benefits and that's why they tend to support those candidates - that's not just a black or hispanic thing, it's a white thing too.
My belief is that many supported Trump because they hoped he would be a disruptor (he is) and looked for him to finally listen to their plight (he isn't). They hoped for him to build a wall (nope) and many, like myself, voted for the candidate least likely to get us into global conflict (off on that, too).
Absent some outliers; I truly believe.
Disruptor? He's disruptive in the sense that he's woefully out of his depth. Functionally-illiterate. Distinct from his treasonous actions while in the Office.
Last edited: