this has been great doing the drills so far.
my understanding of the process so far is:
1- we have the 10 price cases and the only ones that make money are the translations(XB,XR). if we have an internal case we need to merge it to a single bar using the high,low,open,close of all the bars in that internal formation,
2- we identify the leg 2 of the forming single bar to determine sentiment and dominance.
3- we combine all the same (color)leg 2 bars to form a profit segment. geometrically this could be done with a trendline(under price for long and above price for short)
4-A- we further combine this process with volume(the independent variable) to determine if that profit segment is in a longer term dominat or non-dominant cycle.(i would assume increasing vol would mean dom and decreasing would mean non-dom)
however we haven't talked about volume much yet.
B- there was also a mention of when to measure volume in conjunction with the price cases.i assume we measure on translations and not on internals(or combine internals into translations so we can measure) but again i am just speculating.
if the foundation is to be laid out without guessing but as pure data analysis it needs to be solid and i'm afaraid i'm a bit behind on 2 things :what actually constitutes a leg 2 of a single bar.(pic attached)
and how to best combine internals into a single bar to determine leg 2.(what to do with laterals:do we combine individual bars inside it or all of it into one, what to do with outside bars when they are bigger than both the bar before them and the 2 or 3 translations prior, what to do with stitches if they go, sym-stitch etc...) i'll try to attach a pic to further clarify...
thank you very much

my understanding of the process so far is:
1- we have the 10 price cases and the only ones that make money are the translations(XB,XR). if we have an internal case we need to merge it to a single bar using the high,low,open,close of all the bars in that internal formation,
2- we identify the leg 2 of the forming single bar to determine sentiment and dominance.
3- we combine all the same (color)leg 2 bars to form a profit segment. geometrically this could be done with a trendline(under price for long and above price for short)
4-A- we further combine this process with volume(the independent variable) to determine if that profit segment is in a longer term dominat or non-dominant cycle.(i would assume increasing vol would mean dom and decreasing would mean non-dom)
however we haven't talked about volume much yet.
B- there was also a mention of when to measure volume in conjunction with the price cases.i assume we measure on translations and not on internals(or combine internals into translations so we can measure) but again i am just speculating.
if the foundation is to be laid out without guessing but as pure data analysis it needs to be solid and i'm afaraid i'm a bit behind on 2 things :what actually constitutes a leg 2 of a single bar.(pic attached)
and how to best combine internals into a single bar to determine leg 2.(what to do with laterals:do we combine individual bars inside it or all of it into one, what to do with outside bars when they are bigger than both the bar before them and the 2 or 3 translations prior, what to do with stitches if they go, sym-stitch etc...) i'll try to attach a pic to further clarify...
thank you very much
Last edited by a moderator:
