Quote from Bearbelly:
Thanks Mak but I did not get any results for 2 pair.
edit: check that. I did get quite a few on "two pair".
Google ET for "2pair" without space between "2" and "pair". In other hand you can google for âpairâ and âgrob109â in nickname section.
As I can understand, 2pair formation in Jack's approach plays the same role that atom plays in physics. This part of SCT totally coincides with market profile concept. Two pair of price levels is the smallest space where market can build value. So then entire price movement can be divided into two conditions: stall in 2 pair and transition between 2pair areas.
If you want to get in details of 2pair stall and profit from it you NEED to use fine tuned methods. One of the methods that I think success is bid volume VS offer volume analysis. Look attach please. I have charted ES in constant volume increment of 350 contracts per bar. Increment size is the consequence of usual best bid/offer volume and allow represent 2pair/transition picture quite precisely. Additionally âVolume Upâ indication is present and it displays for each bar volume traded at offer so VolumeDown=(350-VolumeUp) contracts traded at bid.
As you can see every time when price spikes up from 2pair stall VolumeDown variable falls to zero for lower pair of 2pair formation. Accordingly when price spikes down from 2pair stall VolumeUp variable falls to zero for upper pair of 2pair formation. Is is very important that we can use âinversed logicâ to analyze 2pair formation. I try to explain. Suppose price is in 2pair stall and we are looking to open long/close short. We have two possible ways:
1. Check whether upper pair dominates and trade if yes. In the best case entry price will be offer price of upper pair, in worst offer price of upper pair + 1 tick and even more for fast market.
2. Check whether lower pair does not dominate and if yes â trade immediately. In this case we get fill at offer price of lower pair most often and offer price of upper pair in some worst cases. This is what I call âinversed logicâ and this method can put chance to be profitable in our favor. Of course this entry method require deep knowledge and experience â it cannot be differently if we are on fine tuned level.
BTW, all parts of Jacks method (coarse, medium and fine levels) are very logical and mostly clear to me. What is not clear at this time â how to put all levels in one holistic picture. So the question is when to move from coarse to medium and from medium to fine to reach optimum balance between trade frequency and PL per trade. At this time I fail to make only 20-40 actions per day to stay at the right side, it requires 50-60 and more what is commission explosive and inefficient.