Domestic policy knowingly harmful to foreigners is extremely subjective.Some would say helping Ukraine is knowingly harmful to foreigners as it could cause nuclear WWIII with Russia.
SCOTUS thread
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Domestic policy knowingly harmful to foreigners is extremely subjective.Some would say helping Ukraine is knowingly harmful to foreigners as it could cause nuclear WWIII with Russia.
is it? If I buy oil from Saudi, it fills their coffers. If I buy blood diamonds from Africa, it keeps slavery in a region going, if I bought bananas from UFC, it kept Latin America subjugated, if England bought cotton from the confederacy....
Maybe I should have said realistic domestic policy knowingly harmful to foreigners is extremely subjective.....
so you think I'm engaging in hypotheticals and not history/current policy?
Progs are trying to go green as fast as possible so the world doesn't have to buy Saudi oil.No prog I know of would support any of your other examples.
You would think not. Progs were all in on Tesla before he showed his true colors.....EVs have shown a lot of resources are exploitive (cobalt in Africa, Lithium leading to coup politics in Bolivia, rare element sourcing by Uighurs, etc...). Most greenies were coffee snobs and all about starbux before they started seeing the problems that caused and decided to demand responsibly sourced coffee.
So going back to the original quandary. Prioritizing domestic spending to abandon Ukrainian aid basically surrenders them to genocide and authoritarian rule.
These last two cases are a riot. No standing whatsoever. Missouri agency shown to make money and didn't even choose to get involved. Made up gay plaintiff in graphic designer case.
It also risks nuclear WWIII with Russia.While Im on the side of Ukraine it is understandable that some dont want The US playing world police or risking nuclear war with Russia over Ukraine.2 presidents didn't want to take that risk when Russia invaded Georgia and Crimea.
Does it? Because a year of aid's shown Russia's not willing to risk it. I wouldn't expect a "prog" POTUS to increase tensions via spending. Should we expect a "prog" POTUS acquiesce & turn over Hawaii to China if they threaten nuclear war after they've taken Taiwan over the same threat?
Holy moly, the liberals are angry and frustrated.
First Roe v Wade DEAD, then affirmative action DEAD, now student loan programs DEAD. Bam, clock turned back on those previous horrific decisions, and rightly so.
I just checked CNN for giggles and my goodness, are the liberals nutty and riled up. Now their most important voter base is in danger: the dumb portion of young minorities who first knock up other sluts in the hood, then expect to get into higher education without the hard work alike their Asian peers, then expecting us taxpayers to foot the bill. Fuck them. They should go back to Africa or wherever they hail from because they are willing participants in destroying the country.
Glad a conscious supreme Court prevails over this left destruction of values and opportunities.
First Roe v Wade DEAD, then affirmative action DEAD, now student loan programs DEAD. Bam, clock turned back on those previous horrific decisions, and rightly so.
I just checked CNN for giggles and my goodness, are the liberals nutty and riled up. Now their most important voter base is in danger: the dumb portion of young minorities who first knock up other sluts in the hood, then expect to get into higher education without the hard work alike their Asian peers, then expecting us taxpayers to foot the bill. Fuck them. They should go back to Africa or wherever they hail from because they are willing participants in destroying the country.
Glad a conscious supreme Court prevails over this left destruction of values and opportunities.