somone mentioned his family history
oddly enough, scott's father claims that he learned as a lawyer in the firm that represented LBJ, that LBJ was in on JFK's killing
i have no idea of the credibility of that
but what is odd about the father and son, is that they both have confidential access to aleged monsterous presidential treason, and both betrayed confidentiality to say what they have to say (the father, atty/clinet privilage, son, there has to be considentiality agreements in being a press secretary)
and the thing is, it may be true, in one, the other or both cases
or neither (although i think the stuff about bush is more true than not)
it's natural to see this as a 'is scott a decent guy' or 'is this all made up' question, i think it's more complicated than that
i think there's probably a lot of truth in what he says, but he's an absolute scumbag in the way he handled it* - kind of like dick morris - a scumbag may tell the truth, because what they want to say happens to be the truth, even if they have no personal credibility
* silent, untill 'his concience', and a 7 figure book deal compelled him to speak out