Quote from Landis82:
But unfortunately, the average guy in the street "Joe-6pack" has absolutely ZERO understanding of how money and capital markets work ( the banking system ). You can also put 98% of Congress in that camp as well. Zero understanding of how the economy and banking system are related.
"Joe-6pack" won't get his economics lesson until he has lost his job because the company that he works for was unable to finance their payroll through the "frozen" commercial paper market, or because the order at his company just dried-up because of a lack of financing.
This is NOT a "great" day for America.
It simply confirms what we already know . . . that the average American is far too dumb to be governed. They are like a DOG, that only knows how to react to one-syllable words like, "fetch" "stay" and "sit".
They are unable to think through even the most slightly complicated issues, like the current one.
Bring on double-digit unemployment rates . . . and an economy that comes screeching to a halt with one bankruptcy after another. It's already happening.
What a shame.
Quote from Aaron Copland:
Still handing out Econ 101 lessons Landis? Seems your the one who can't seem to come to grips with this.
Quote from TraderJoe08:
Ron Paul voted against the bill. Period.
Keep pumping money in and make the dollar worthless and we will have much greater problems than this. Please watch the video of Ron Paul today.
Quote from theboxer:
I agree that people - and most of Congress - are clueless on economics and markets. And also that joe 6pack opposed the bailout for reasons of his own that are probably too stupid to discuss. I also agree that the ramifications will suck. But I don't believe I've ever seen people actually make their voice heard in government like this; so that in and of itself is a good thing. If it were backed up by actual knowledge, that would be great.
Quote from Adobian:
Not so fast here. The democrats were against the original bail out in the first place. Bush wants to pass this, so the Dems get the ridiculous terms in, most everythings were for the people, for Americans. Fund for Schools, Limits on CEO's pay .... etc ... In the end, it's a bail out package the proves to be so disadvantageous to the Republicans that they have to bite the bullets and rejected it. That's why the Dems were so all for it when they were really against it in the beginning.
Got it?
Quote from Cache Landing:
We don't live in a democracy. We live in a republic. What you just described is how a republic works. IF this were a democracy, then we would all be voting on this bill instead of the elected representatives.
In any case. It didn't have "something" to do with congressmen wanting to keep their seats. It had "everything" to do with them wanting to keep their seats. What it comes down to is that the vast majority of Americans don't want this bill. The vast majority of GOP congressmen don't want this bill either. The vast majority of DEM congressmen do want this bill, but what they don't want is to be tied to it come election time. They want the money, but they know the bill is unpopular and they are already the most disapproved congress in the nation's history.
Quote from Adobian:
Not so fast here. The democrats were against the original bail out in the first place. Bush wants to pass this, so the Dems get the ridiculous terms in, most everythings were for the people, for Americans. Fund for Schools, Limits on CEO's pay .... etc ... In the end, it's a bail out package the proves to be so disadvantageous to the Republicans that they have to bite the bullets and rejected it. That's why the Dems were so all for it when they were really against it in the beginning.
Got it?