Scientists Warn: PREPARE NOW For A Mini ICE AGE As The Sun Cools

[jem]

There is not one scientist who has produced peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming not based on failed models.

so everything you write is anti science bullshit.

...
science does not work by consensus.
scientist don't try to prove co2 does contribute to warming. But there are tens of thousands of skeptical scientists.

I have presented the evidence of the consensus and the science multiple -too many (you know because you count them and then report me to the mods like a little baby) times you liar. You have posted nothing showing that even ONE publishing climate scientist denies man made global warming.

That's because no publishing climate anywhere in the world denies man made global warming and the lists that have been presented as such and you swallow whole do not contain one either.

And you deniers don't bring info to the table, you present moslty irrelevant bullshit from bullshit sources. That's because NO relevant scientist anywhere in the world denies AGW. The fact that YOU do should make you feel pretty stupid.

Here it is again, from NASA, on a NASA website,https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ love how you try to demean the info on a NASA website but praise stuff from some guy's blog, and the same thing can be found at NOAA and at the EPA (at least before Donny Dumbo got in),and also on WIKI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

 

[futurecurrents]

Oh jem, what is your major malfunction.

 

[jem]

why do you sell a greenhouse gas thousands of times more powerful than co2 for a living and then come and troll here about a consensus with zero peer reviewed science.

Oh jem, what is your major malfunction.

 

[Wallet]

Here's your main driver for Earth's temps.

https://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml

Here's your CO2 info, it's cyclical and always been here.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/...e/nasa-finally-admit-its-going-to-get-colder/

The branch of research looking at the ice core samples to document climate for thousands of years has established the major solar cycle of about 300 years. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), which has the ice core data back 800,000 years, is being shut down as of September 2017 (800,000-year Ice-Core Records of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2)).

The data clearly establishes that there has always been a cycle to CO2 long before man’s industrial age.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

There is not one scientist who has produced peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming not based on failed models.

so everything you write is anti science bullshit.

...
science does not work by consensus.
scientist don't try to prove co2 does contribute to warming. But there are tens of thousands of skeptical scientists.

 

[futurecurrents]

Here's your main driver for Earth's temps.

https://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml

Here's your CO2 info, it's cyclical and always been here.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/...e/nasa-finally-admit-its-going-to-get-colder/

The branch of research looking at the ice core samples to document climate for thousands of years has established the major solar cycle of about 300 years. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), which has the ice core data back 800,000 years, is being shut down as of September 2017 (800,000-year Ice-Core Records of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2)).

The data clearly establishes that there has always been a cycle to CO2 long before man’s industrial age.

Oh, so CO2 is a greenhouse gas? Is that what you are saying?

"armstrong economics.com" !!!!!! LOL

Wow you deniers will believe anything you read on the internet won't you. So gullible, so stupid.

 

[Wallet]

Oh, so CO2 is a greenhouse gas? Is that what you are saying?

"armstrong economics.com" !!!!!! LOL

Wow you deniers will believe anything you read on the internet won't you. So gullible, so stupid.

Just pointing to sources that quote your beloved NASA, who are saying we are headed into a mini ice age not getting hotter. Why? The Sun.

Core samples show that CO2 levels are cyclical.

There's much more proof that Nature is the driver of Earth's temp than man.

 

[futurecurrents]

Just pointing to sources that quote your beloved NASA, who are saying we are headed into a mini ice age not getting hotter. Why? The Sun.

Core samples show that CO2 levels are cyclical.

There's much more proof that Nature is the driver of Earth's temp than man.

So is CO2 a greenhouse gas or what.

No NASA is not saying that we are going into an ice age, your joke of a blogger says that.

Of course more than man affects the climate. Duh.

 

[jem]

so do you sell a greenhouse gas thousands of times more powerful than co2 for a living?
does that make you an eco terrrorist?
why not?

So is CO2 a greenhouse gas or what.

No NASA is not saying that we are going into an ice age, your joke of a blogger says that.

Of course more than man affects the climate. Duh.