Scientists propose a 50 days on, 30 days off coronavirus lockdown strategy
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
They laid off doctors and nurses because there was no work for them. Only a handful to handle Corona Virus cases. So, you have empty hospital beds waiting for Corona Virus patients that are not there. In the meantime, patients with serious illnesses like cancer or heart disease are not getting care. Heaven help you if you personally, or any of your loved ones need medical care for any illness not Corona Virus related. They will not treat you because you could get infected by the Corona Virus patients but, you could die from lack of treatment as well. I am sure they are going to classify your death as Corona Virus related. They closed the 2,910 bed Javits Center in New York after the last patient checked out from Corona Virus. Yet, the narrative continues to be put out that there will be a 2nd wave and mass hospitalizations to come real soon. When are the lies and disinformation going to end? It is all tied to efforts to keep the states economies shutdown to destroy the US economy. They have to justify the lockdowns so, the lies, paranoia and hysteria has to continue. No matter the deaths, lost of jobs and anxiety created in people.?
Yes we need to manage all levels of risk and do it with levels of prioritization. So far the health care system at large has been nowhere near overwhelmed. It would also help if the media wasn't trying to terrorize and terrify people into going and getting a test every time they cough more than twice.
How do we manage risk when it's food contamination? Yes it's for perfect analogy for how we manage health risk. When Chipotle serves up some extra bowel irritation, do we shutdown every Mexican restaurant in the country? We identify and isolate the problem. When there is an e-coli breakout of say chicken, do we stop buying all meat? Do we shutdown the entire grocery store? Do we close down all grocery stores nationwide? There is a world of difference between defending against what is possible and what is probable.We are attempting to defend against all that is possible which is in fact impossible. The risk in say NYC is very different than the risk of little town middle of nowhere America.
Don't ask me why we didn't have a targeted approach. Ask Trump why he took an e-coli giant shit on all the food supply.
I don't have to ask you, I know why. We were told that all people nationwide were at risk of dying by the millions. No need for a targeted approach in that case, so we shutdown all of America as if the risk was just as high in Buffalo Wyoming as it was in NYC. Now we're trying to unwind that colossal mistake and people are still trying to claim all risk is equal. It's not.
No, we had a national shut down, because your dumbass sat with his thumb up his ass for months, so localized shut downs became impossible once every state had it.
You do realize in many states including North Carolina it is still difficult to get a test. I don't think that people who cough twice are getting a test. We are even turning away people still with multiple symptoms.
now you are trying to cover up for your stupid opening statement.
you are a deceptive douche.
I will post your original comment next.
you are a deceptive douche.
I will post your original comment next.