Scientists...Got it wrong again!

Quote from killthesunshine:

Models have a way of taking on a life of their own. Don't allow an unnecessary proliferation of the same.

verify, verify, and verify again. then verify :D

Are you speaking of Zoolander ? :cool:
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

How is it, in your opinion, that "time" adds a fatal flaw to the argument ?

Time implies a sequence, but time is relative. The entire "before/after" may mean nothing. What does time mean in 5, 6,...X dimensions?
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

we are lucky that stu posts here.

my advice is to talk less and listen more to stu.

he has it going on!


OK, Zoolander does not ring a bell.........

How about the court case Goose v. Gander ? :)
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

OK, Zoolander does not ring a bell.........

How about the court case Goose v. Gander ? :)

does any of this provide proof of your God/ if so, i am your humble servent :D

there is no man that i canot learn from
 
Quote from stu:

Potential is Existing in possibility.

Hold on a second there, fella...

Leave us distinguish between "existing in possibility" and "possible existence" (potential).

The former presupposes existence; the latter presupposes non-existence.

Thank GOD I dropped in to straighten this mess out. Amen.
 
When you guys can tell me whether or not Time can exist in the absence of all other things I'll get back to you with the Final Answer to the Big Question.
 
Back
Top