Your original claim, which I suspected to be bullshit. And it is bullshit.
I went and found the
video press conference from DeSantis and watched the whole thing. Feel free to watch, but you can skip ahead to his comments regarding masks at the 19:20 mark (counting down) on the video when he is asked by a reporter about it.
What he says - quite clearly to anyone being honest - is that enforcement of masks would backfire. He says we have seen some localities impose mask requirements on the population and they will have to figure out how to use "the long arm of the law" to enforce it. He also says "businesses will require people coming in to wear masks, which is fine but a lot of what we're seeing with younger people - if they're partying at someone's house, they're probably not wearing masks. Let's just be honest. You'd have to change behavior there (in regards to enforcement). Businesses do a good job of creating a safe environment and a lot of customers want to see that so they have every incentive to do it. We're going to continue to put out the right guidance and expect people to make the right decisions."
Then at 10:49 (again, counting down). Someone asks him again about a mandate. He brings up the mandate on restricting gatherings of more than 10 people that is
still in place in S. Florida. He asks the group if they saw any "Gatherings" of people greater than 10 out there. They laugh. He points out that this mandate was ignored and impossible to enforce, nor did anyone try to enforce it. "The idea that you're just going to mandate and selectively prosecute isn't going to work. What is going to work is to educate and inform and consistent messaging on what people can do to protect themselves and others." Lastly, he mentions that there are sheriffs in parts of Florida that have stated they do not have the capability to enforce mandates and wouldn't try to.
That's all he said. Everything.
Which part of his comments were "anti-science"? Was it the part where businesses are incented by their customers to do it? Or perhaps it was the part where local municipalities would have to figure out how to enforce it? Ooooh...I know, was it the part where he said the young people (who are the vast preponderance of the cases right now) who are getting it at parties and the like would be hard to police a mandate on?