Science vs Republicans

....
And you consider this "science".
...
I posted what I posted, an opinion piece. Nothing more. You presume I consider it "science".

I leave the science to the Scientists, unlike others playing .... with themselves.
 
I posted what I posted, an opinion piece. Nothing more. You presume I consider it "science".

I leave the science to the Scientists, unlike others playing .... with themselves.

As, I just assumed that when you posed in big font a comment that told us what has no basis in science, that you were making an argument about what does have basis in science.

Silly me.

At least we both agree the article you posted was just an editorial with no basis in science.
 
"And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning?

"So it'd be interesting to check that."

Pointing to his head, Mr Trump went on: "I'm not a doctor. But I'm, like, a person that has a good you-know-what."

How many Republican senators advised people not to listen to Trump on the bleach cure?

Trump is not the problem. He is only a symptom of the anti-science rot among Republicans
 
No comment from the wingnuts though.

Now you want us to comment every time you're right as well? Is this to help support what might be a confidence problem on your part?

Barr is clueless. No chemicals in what is clearly a chemical spray. Sheesh.

When you post something we have no problem with, we might not post to counter your statement! This is because we judge whether an action is right or wrong, not by who does the action (like folks on the left do) but on whether this action was right or wrong!

Barr was an idiot for making this statement.
 
Back
Top